Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRyan, A
dc.contributor.authorJudd, T
dc.contributor.authorSwanson, D
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, DP
dc.contributor.authorElliott, S
dc.contributor.authorTzanetos, K
dc.contributor.authorKulasegaram, K
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T03:31:33Z
dc.date.available2020-11-17T03:31:33Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-12
dc.identifierpii: 10.1007/s40037-020-00606-z
dc.identifier.citationRyan, A., Judd, T., Swanson, D., Larsen, D. P., Elliott, S., Tzanetos, K. & Kulasegaram, K. (2020). Beyond right or wrong: More effective feedback for formative multiple-choice tests. PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION, 9 (5), pp.307-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00606-z.
dc.identifier.issn2212-2761
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/251529
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: The role of feedback in test-enhanced learning is an understudied area that has the potential to improve student learning. This study investigates the influence of different forms of post-test feedback on retention and transfer of biomedical knowledge within a test-enhanced learning framework. METHODS: 64 participants from a Canadian and an Australian medical school sat two single-best-answer formative multiple choice tests one week apart. We compared the effects of conceptually focused, response-oriented, and simple right/wrong feedback on a learner's ability to correctly answer new (transfer) questions. On the first test occasion, participants received parent items with feedback, and then attempted items closely related (near transfer) to and more distant (far transfer) from parent items. In a repeat test at 1 week, participants were given different near and far transfer versions of parent items. Feedback type, and near and far transfer items were randomized within and across participants. RESULTS: Analysis demonstrated that response-oriented and conceptually focused feedback were superior to traditional right/wrong feedback for both types of transfer tasks and in both immediate and final retention test performance. However, there was no statistically significant difference between response-orientated and conceptually focused groups on near or far transfer problems, nor any differences in performance between our initial test occasion and the retention test 1 week later. As with most studies of transfer, participants' far transfer scores were lower than for near transfer. DISCUSSION: Right/wrong feedback appears to have limited potential to augment test-enhanced learning. Our work suggests that item-level feedback and feedback that identifies and elaborates on key conceptual knowledge are two important areas for future research on learning, retention and transfer.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSPRINGERNATURE
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titleBeyond right or wrong: More effective feedback for formative multiple-choice tests
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40037-020-00606-z
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMedical Education
melbourne.source.titlePerspectives on Medical Education
melbourne.source.volume9
melbourne.source.issue5
melbourne.source.pages307-313
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
melbourne.elementsid1461137
melbourne.contributor.authorRyan, Anna
melbourne.contributor.authorJudd, Terry
melbourne.contributor.authorSwanson, David
melbourne.contributor.authorElliott, Simone
dc.identifier.eissn2212-277X
melbourne.identifier.fundernameidUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, Subgrant1 - 503618
melbourne.accessrightsOpen Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record