Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPollard, Stephen Gregory
dc.description© 2020 Stephen Gregory Pollard
dc.description.abstractThe concept of global net zero emissions has emerged as a powerful unifying narrative to connect the science and policy of climate change. This thesis examines how policy actors translate the concept of global net zero emissions across different scales and contexts into local goals for, and actions towards, community-scale carbon neutrality. The study is based on an ethnographic comparison of three diverse local jurisdictions with such goals: the City of Copenhagen in Denmark, and the City of Melbourne and Byron Shire in Australia. In establishing these goals, policy actors in each place delineate the boundaries between sources and sinks of emissions using similar methods of municipal carbon accounting, but with distinctive preferences for how and where to balance those emissions. Comparison within and between these places reveals patterns of relations and situated contingencies that shape choices and actions in relation to net zero emissions goals. The analysis draws together concepts from anthropology and science and technology studies (STS) to examine local goals for community-scale carbon neutrality. Such goals may take hold as sociotechnical imaginaries that express collective visions for desirable futures. These goals are anchored to particular localities through spatial and conceptual boundaries that are co-produced in relation to objects and scales of climate governance. Enacting carbon neutrality involves reconfiguring open-ended assemblages of heterogeneous social and material elements within and across these boundaries. Friction enables and constrains these reconfigurations, pulling assemblages in new directions to inflect pathways of sociotechnical change. These concepts are tied together through the thesis to generate insights into how policy actors translate the concept of global net zero emissions into local goals for, and actions towards, community-scale carbon neutrality. The thesis demonstrates common processes and relationships involved in collective efforts to imagine and enact community-scale carbon neutrality, and at the same time shows these to be contingent, unstable and continually unfolding. Ethnographic comparison of local climate governance allows us to learn from and imagine other ways of pursuing low carbon futures in response to climate change. Approaching carbon neutrality as relational and contextually specific reveals multiple pathways and possibilities for ecological, social and technical change. Governing human activities and sociotechnical systems towards carbon neutrality is not only about steering processes of change towards a preconceived ideal but also involves ongoing performances of place and community. These practices require reflexivity towards past histories and current contexts, and flexibility to adjust to shifting circumstances.
dc.rightsTerms and Conditions: Copyright in works deposited in Minerva Access is retained by the copyright owner. The work may not be altered without permission from the copyright owner. Readers may only download, print and save electronic copies of whole works for their own personal non-commercial use. Any use that exceeds these limits requires permission from the copyright owner. Attribution is essential when quoting or paraphrasing from these works.
dc.subjectClimate change policy
dc.subjectNet zero emissions
dc.subjectCommunity-scale carbon neutrality
dc.subjectMultilevel climate governance
dc.subjectMunicipal carbon accounting
dc.subjectSociotechnical imaginaries
dc.subjectCarbon assemblages
dc.titleLocating net zero emissions: an ethnographic comparison of local approaches to community-scale carbon neutrality
dc.typePhD thesis
melbourne.affiliation.departmentArchitecture, Building and Planning
melbourne.thesis.supervisornameJohn Wiseman
melbourne.contributor.authorPollard, Stephen Gregory
melbourne.thesis.supervisorothernameMonica Minnegal
melbourne.tes.fieldofresearch1440107 Social and cultural anthropology
melbourne.tes.fieldofresearch2441007 Sociology and social studies of science and technology
melbourne.tes.fieldofresearch3440704 Environment policy
melbourne.tes.fieldofresearch4440805 Environmental politics
melbourne.accessrights This item is embargoed and will be available on 2022-11-26. This item is currently available to University of Melbourne staff and students only, login required.

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record