University Library
  • Login
A gateway to Melbourne's research publications
Minerva Access is the University's Institutional Repository. It aims to collect, preserve, and showcase the intellectual output of staff and students of the University of Melbourne for a global audience.
View Item 
  • Minerva Access
  • Melbourne Law School
  • Melbourne Law School - Research Publications
  • View Item
  • Minerva Access
  • Melbourne Law School
  • Melbourne Law School - Research Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Administrative Power

    Thumbnail
    Download
    Accepted version (176.8Kb)

    Citations
    Altmetric
    Author
    Biddulph, S
    Editor
    Cane, P; Hofmann, H; Ip, E; Lindseth, P
    Date
    2021
    Source Title
    The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Administrative Law
    Publisher
    Oxford University Press
    University of Melbourne Author/s
    Biddulph, Sarah
    Affiliation
    Melbourne Law School
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Document Type
    Chapter
    Citations
    Biddulph, S. (2021). Administrative Power. Cane, P (Ed.). Hofmann, H (Ed.). Ip, E (Ed.). Lindseth, P (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Administrative Law, (1), Oxford University Press.
    Access Status
    Open Access
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11343/252727
    ARC Grant code
    ARC/FT130100412
    Abstract
    This chapter compares the respective roles of administrative institutions and administrative power on the one hand, and other governmental institutions and powers on the other, in dealing with drug use, possession, and trafficking in China and Victoria (Australia). Comparison of these two jurisdictions provides both opportunities and challenges. Though one is a nation-state, the other a sub-national state within a federation, both have jurisdiction to regulate drug use-related harms and offending. There is thus comparability in terms of jurisdiction. More importantly, the opportunities and challenges for comparison stem from the divergence in fundamental political system; one authoritarian and one liberal democratic, and the nature of the relationship between state and citizen that flows from this. This divergence has implications for selection of both comparative methodology and the subject matter of comparison.

    Export Reference in RIS Format     

    Endnote

    • Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".

    Refworks

    • Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References


    Collections
    • Minerva Elements Records [45770]
    • Melbourne Law School - Research Publications [928]
    Minerva AccessDepositing Your Work (for University of Melbourne Staff and Students)NewsFAQs

    BrowseCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    My AccountLoginRegister
    StatisticsMost Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors