Lay Concepts of Art, Craft, and Manufacture and the Implications for Sustainable Consumption
AuthorJudge, M; Fernando, JW; Paladino, A; Mikolajczak, G; Kashima, Y
Source TitleJournal of Social Issues
University of Melbourne Author/sPaladino, Angela; Judge, Madeline; Fernando, Julian; Kashima, Yoshihisa; Mikolajczak, Malgorzata
AffiliationMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences
Management and Marketing
School of Social and Political Sciences
Document TypeJournal Article
CitationsJudge, M., Fernando, J. W., Paladino, A., Mikolajczak, G. & Kashima, Y. (2020). Lay Concepts of Art, Craft, and Manufacture and the Implications for Sustainable Consumption. Journal of Social Issues, 76 (1), pp.19-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12368.
Access StatusOpen Access
ARC Grant codeARC/IH120100053
An object's creation history plays an important role in how we perceive, value, and interact with that object, and has consequences for policy on sustainable consumption. Here, we propose that laypeople in industrialized societies have three dominant concepts of how objects can be created: art, craft, and manufacture. These concepts are differentiated by the perceived properties and environmental sustainability of objects, as well as the perceived capabilities of producers. In three experiments, we examined the consequences of framing an object's creation history as art, craft, or manufacture. In general, art and craft objects were valued more highly than manufactured objects, and this effect was partially mediated by the perceived transfer of positive emotional residue. Mass‐produced goods may be treated as disposable consumables, whereas arts and crafts are more deserving of preservation. That this effect was stronger in Australia than China suggests that these effects may be related to a postmaterialist orientation.
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References