University Library
  • Login
A gateway to Melbourne's research publications
Minerva Access is the University's Institutional Repository. It aims to collect, preserve, and showcase the intellectual output of staff and students of the University of Melbourne for a global audience.
View Item 
  • Minerva Access
  • Science
  • School of Mathematics and Statistics
  • School of Mathematics and Statistics - Research Publications
  • View Item
  • Minerva Access
  • Science
  • School of Mathematics and Statistics
  • School of Mathematics and Statistics - Research Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Choice of transcripts and software has a large effect on variant annotation

    Thumbnail
    Download
    Published version (1.502Mb)

    Citations
    Scopus
    Web of Science
    Altmetric
    89
    80
    Author
    McCarthy, DJ; Humburg, P; Kanapin, A; Rivas, MA; Gaulton, K; Cazier, J-B; Donnelly, P
    Date
    2014-03-31
    Source Title
    Genome Medicine: medicine in the post-genomic era
    Publisher
    BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
    University of Melbourne Author/s
    McCarthy, Davis
    Affiliation
    School of Mathematics and Statistics
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Document Type
    Journal Article
    Citations
    McCarthy, D. J., Humburg, P., Kanapin, A., Rivas, M. A., Gaulton, K., Cazier, J. -B. & Donnelly, P. (2014). Choice of transcripts and software has a large effect on variant annotation. GENOME MEDICINE, 6 (3), https://doi.org/10.1186/gm543.
    Access Status
    Open Access
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11343/253668
    DOI
    10.1186/gm543
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: Variant annotation is a crucial step in the analysis of genome sequencing data. Functional annotation results can have a strong influence on the ultimate conclusions of disease studies. Incorrect or incomplete annotations can cause researchers both to overlook potentially disease-relevant DNA variants and to dilute interesting variants in a pool of false positives. Researchers are aware of these issues in general, but the extent of the dependency of final results on the choice of transcripts and software used for annotation has not been quantified in detail. METHODS: This paper quantifies the extent of differences in annotation of 80 million variants from a whole-genome sequencing study. We compare results using the RefSeq and Ensembl transcript sets as the basis for variant annotation with the software Annovar, and also compare the results from two annotation software packages, Annovar and VEP (Ensembl's Variant Effect Predictor), when using Ensembl transcripts. RESULTS: We found only 44% agreement in annotations for putative loss-of-function variants when using the RefSeq and Ensembl transcript sets as the basis for annotation with Annovar. The rate of matching annotations for loss-of-function and nonsynonymous variants combined was 79% and for all exonic variants it was 83%. When comparing results from Annovar and VEP using Ensembl transcripts, matching annotations were seen for only 65% of loss-of-function variants and 87% of all exonic variants, with splicing variants revealed as the category with the greatest discrepancy. Using these comparisons, we characterised the types of apparent errors made by Annovar and VEP and discuss their impact on the analysis of DNA variants in genome sequencing studies. CONCLUSIONS: Variant annotation is not yet a solved problem. Choice of transcript set can have a large effect on the ultimate variant annotations obtained in a whole-genome sequencing study. Choice of annotation software can also have a substantial effect. The annotation step in the analysis of a genome sequencing study must therefore be considered carefully, and a conscious choice made as to which transcript set and software are used for annotation.

    Export Reference in RIS Format     

    Endnote

    • Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".

    Refworks

    • Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References


    Collections
    • Minerva Elements Records [45689]
    • School of Mathematics and Statistics - Research Publications [680]
    Minerva AccessDepositing Your Work (for University of Melbourne Staff and Students)NewsFAQs

    BrowseCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    My AccountLoginRegister
    StatisticsMost Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors