Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmatya, B
dc.contributor.authorKhan, F
dc.contributor.authorWindle, I
dc.contributor.authorLowe, M
dc.contributor.authorGalea, MP
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-14T06:13:41Z
dc.date.available2020-12-14T06:13:41Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.identifier.citationAmatya, B., Khan, F., Windle, I., Lowe, M. & Galea, M. P. (2020). EVALUATION OF A TECHNOLOGY-ASSISTED ENRICHED ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES PROGRAMME FOR UPPER LIMB FUNCTION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 52 (1), https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2526.
dc.identifier.issn1650-1977
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/254149
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of an intensive technology-assisted inpatient enriched environmental programme for upper limb function. METHODS: Patients consecutively admitted to the rehabilitation unit randomly allocated to an intervention (enriched environmental programme, n = 46)) or a control group (usual ward activity, n = 46). Assessments were performed at baseline (T0), discharge (T1) and 3 months (T2) using validated measures. RESULTS: At T1, the enriched environmental group showed significant improvement in upper limb func-tion, compared with the control group: Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) "Total" (p = 0.002), and "Grip", "Pinch" and "Gross" subscales (p < 0.05 for all), with small effect size = 0.04-0.16. Most participants in the enriched environmental group had clinically significant improvement > 5.7 points on the ARAT "Total" compared with the control group (83% vs 44%, p < 0.001). Participants in the enriched environmental group were more involved in various forms of activities during waking hours. At T2, despite no significant between-group difference in ARAT scores, the majority of participants in the enriched environmental group maintained the improvement (> 5.7 points) on ARAT "Total" compared with the control group (91% vs 61%, p = 0.001). Both groups improved in other measures at both T1 and T2. CONCLUSION: An enriched environmental programme was feasible and effective in improving upper limb function and increasing the activity of patients during their inpatient subacute care.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherFOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION
dc.titleEVALUATION OF A TECHNOLOGY-ASSISTED ENRICHED ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES PROGRAMME FOR UPPER LIMB FUNCTION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.2340/16501977-2526
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMedicine and Radiology
melbourne.source.titleJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine
melbourne.source.volume52
melbourne.source.issue1
melbourne.elementsid1422221
melbourne.openaccess.urlhttp://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2625
melbourne.openaccess.statusPublished version
melbourne.contributor.authorKhan, Farees
melbourne.contributor.authorGalea, Mary
melbourne.contributor.authorAmatya, Bhasker
melbourne.contributor.authorBhasker, Amatya
dc.identifier.eissn1651-2081
melbourne.accessrightsAccess this item via the Open Access location


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record