Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLit, Gary Ying Loong
dc.description© 2020 Gary Ying Loong Lit
dc.description.abstractWhile the successes and achievements of Singapore and its education system have been widely acknowledged and recognized in the world, predominantly via the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS; TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Centre, n.d.) and the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD], n.d.), the daily struggles and sacrifices of its teachers do not feature prominently in the accounts. As a former teacher and retired teacher–educator, I have undertaken a deeply meaningful autoethnographic study, drawing on my experiences of interactions and conversations with colleagues who are either retired or serving teachers. My experiences reveal circumstances lived by what I believe to be a silent majority of teachers whose daily toils and identities have been sacrificed on the altar of nation-building and economic development in Singapore over more than 50 years. In recalling the ups and downs of lives spent in teaching through the decades since Singapore’s independence, my study is thus a reflection of the wider social and national trends occurring in the nation that remains in the grasp of rapid economic and national development (Marechal, 2000; Reed-Danahay, 1997; Schwandt, 2007). In my study, I explored the various discursive practices adopted by the Singapore government to subjectivize its teachers to produce what Foucault (1979) called “docile bodies” (p. 136) to serve its social, economic, and political objectives. I aim to open up more spaces and create new perspectives from which to look at the education system and schools in Singapore, with a view to interrogating the often rigid, and sometimes restrictive, regime operating in Singapore schools. To this end, the Foucauldian analytical approach is most suitable for explicating these issues, enabling deeper insight into the power relations operating in Singapore in general and the schools in particular. It also helps comprehension of the reasons behind the evolution of the policies that have led to the system of schools in Singapore today. In particular, it illuminates the ways power is exercised to support the culture of performativity in Singapore schools. To complement my Foucauldian analysis, I adopted Ball’s (2003) conceptual framework to explicate and examine the various policies and practices expressed through the culture of performativity in Singapore schools.
dc.rightsTerms and Conditions: Copyright in works deposited in Minerva Access is retained by the copyright owner. The work may not be altered without permission from the copyright owner. Readers may only download, print and save electronic copies of whole works for their own personal non-commercial use. Any use that exceeds these limits requires permission from the copyright owner. Attribution is essential when quoting or paraphrasing from these works.
dc.subjectSingapore education system
dc.subjectThe Thinking School, Learning Nation policy
dc.subjectSingapore Kindness Movement
dc.subjectStephen Ball
dc.subjectDiscursive and divisive practices
dc.subjectDisciplinary power
dc.subjectSubjectivity and teacher identity
dc.titleThe Impact of Governmentality and Performativity on Teachers’ Work in Singapore from 1983 to 2011
dc.typePhD thesis
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMelbourne Graduate School of Education
melbourne.thesis.supervisornameJohn Quay
melbourne.contributor.authorLit, Gary Ying Loong
melbourne.thesis.supervisorothernameDaniela Acquaro
melbourne.tes.fieldofresearch1390399 Education systems not elsewhere classified
melbourne.tes.fieldofresearch2390403 Educational administration, management and leadership
melbourne.accessrightsThis item is embargoed and will be available on 2022-12-16.

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record