Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCade, JE
dc.contributor.authorWarthon-Medina, M
dc.contributor.authorAlbar, S
dc.contributor.authorAlwan, NA
dc.contributor.authorNess, A
dc.contributor.authorRoe, M
dc.contributor.authorWark, PA
dc.contributor.authorGreathead, K
dc.contributor.authorBurley, VJ
dc.contributor.authorFinglas, P
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, L
dc.contributor.authorPage, P
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, K
dc.contributor.authorSteer, T
dc.contributor.authorHooson, J
dc.contributor.authorGreenwood, DC
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, S
dc.contributor.authorDIET@NET consortium
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-17T03:19:45Z
dc.date.available2020-12-17T03:19:45Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-15
dc.identifierpii: 10.1186/s12916-017-0962-x
dc.identifier.citationCade, J. E., Warthon-Medina, M., Albar, S., Alwan, N. A., Ness, A., Roe, M., Wark, P. A., Greathead, K., Burley, V. J., Finglas, P., Johnson, L., Page, P., Roberts, K., Steer, T., Hooson, J., Greenwood, D. C., Robinson, S. & DIET@NET consortium (2017). DIET@NET: Best Practice Guidelines for dietary assessment in health research.. BMC Med, 15 (1), pp.202-. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0962-x.
dc.identifier.issn1741-7015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/254838
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Dietary assessment is complex, and strategies to select the most appropriate dietary assessment tool (DAT) in epidemiological research are needed. The DIETary Assessment Tool NETwork (DIET@NET) aimed to establish expert consensus on Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs) for dietary assessment using self-report. METHODS: The BPGs were developed using the Delphi technique. Two Delphi rounds were conducted. A total of 131 experts were invited, and of these 65 accepted, with 48 completing Delphi round I and 51 completing Delphi round II. In all, a total of 57 experts from North America, Europe, Asia and Australia commented on the 47 suggested guidelines. RESULTS: Forty-three guidelines were generated, grouped into the following four stages: Stage I. Define what is to be measured in terms of dietary intake (what? who? and when?); Stage II. Investigate different types of DATs; Stage III. Evaluate existing tools to select the most appropriate DAT by evaluating published validation studies; Stage IV. Think through the implementation of the chosen DAT and consider sources of potential biases. CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi technique consolidated expert views on best practice in assessing dietary intake. The BPGs provide a valuable guide for health researchers to choose the most appropriate dietary assessment method for their studies. These guidelines will be accessible through the Nutritools website, www.nutritools.org .
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.titleDIET@NET: Best Practice Guidelines for dietary assessment in health research.
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12916-017-0962-x
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMelbourne School of Population and Global Health
melbourne.source.titleBMC Medicine
melbourne.source.volume15
melbourne.source.issue1
melbourne.source.pages202-
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
melbourne.elementsid1324039
melbourne.openaccess.pmchttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5686956
melbourne.contributor.authorBaglietto, Laura
dc.identifier.eissn1741-7015
melbourne.accessrightsOpen Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record