University Library
  • Login
A gateway to Melbourne's research publications
Minerva Access is the University's Institutional Repository. It aims to collect, preserve, and showcase the intellectual output of staff and students of the University of Melbourne for a global audience.
View Item 
  • Minerva Access
  • Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences
  • Melbourne Medical School
  • Medical Education
  • Medical Education - Research Publications
  • View Item
  • Minerva Access
  • Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences
  • Melbourne Medical School
  • Medical Education
  • Medical Education - Research Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Randomised controlled trial to improve health and reduce substance use in established psychosis (IMPaCT): cost-effectiveness of integrated psychosocial health promotion.

    Thumbnail
    Download
    Published version (548.4Kb)

    Citations
    Scopus
    Web of Science
    Altmetric
    3
    3
    Author
    Heslin, M; Patel, A; Stahl, D; Gardner-Sood, P; Mushore, M; Smith, S; Greenwood, K; Onagbesan, O; O'Brien, C; Fung, C; ...
    Date
    2017-12-22
    Source Title
    BMC Psychiatry
    Publisher
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    University of Melbourne Author/s
    Murray, Robin
    Affiliation
    Medical Education
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Document Type
    Journal Article
    Citations
    Heslin, M., Patel, A., Stahl, D., Gardner-Sood, P., Mushore, M., Smith, S., Greenwood, K., Onagbesan, O., O'Brien, C., Fung, C., Ohlsen, R., Hopkins, D., Lowe, P., Arbuthnot, M., Mutatsa, S., Todd, G., Kolliakou, A., Lally, J., Stubbs, B. ,... Gaughran, F. (2017). Randomised controlled trial to improve health and reduce substance use in established psychosis (IMPaCT): cost-effectiveness of integrated psychosocial health promotion.. BMC Psychiatry, 17 (1), pp.407-. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1570-1.
    Access Status
    Open Access
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11343/255282
    DOI
    10.1186/s12888-017-1570-1
    Open Access at PMC
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741948
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: There is mounting evidence that people with severe mental illness have unhealthy lifestyles, high rates of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, and greater risk of early mortality. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of a health promotion intervention seeking to improve physical health and reduce substance use in people with psychosis. METHODS: Participants with a psychotic disorder, aged 18-65 years old and registered on an enhanced care approach programme or equivalent were recruited from community mental health teams in six mental health trusts in England. Participants were randomisation to either standard community mental health team care (treatment as usual) or treatment as usual with an integrated health promotion intervention (IMPaCT). Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses from health and social care and societal perspectives were conducted alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial. Total health and social care costs and total societal costs at 12 and 15 months were calculated as well as cost-effectiveness (incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves) at 15 months based on quality of life (SF-36 mental and physical health components, primary outcome measures) and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) using two measures, EQ-5D-3 L and SF-36. Data were analysed using bootstrapped regressions with covariates for relevant baseline variables. RESULTS: At 12-15 months 301 participants had full data needed to be included in the economic evaluation. There were no differences in adjusted health and social care costs (£95, 95% CI -£1410 to £1599) or societal costs (£675, 95% CI -£1039 to £2388) between the intervention and control arms. Similarly, there were no differences between the groups in the SF-36 mental component (-0.80, 95% CI -3.66 to 2.06), SF-36 physical component (-0.68, 95% CI -3.01 to 1.65), QALYs estimated from the SF-36 (-0.00, -0.01 to 0.00) or QALYs estimated from the EQ-5D-3 L (0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.02). Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for all four outcomes and from both cost perspectives indicate that the probability of the health promotion intervention being cost-effective does not exceed 0.4 for willingness to pay thresholds ranging from £0-£50,000. CONCLUSIONS: Alongside no evidence of additional quality of life/clinical benefit, there is also no evidence of cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN58667926 . Date retrospectively registered: 23/04/2010. Recruitment start date: 01/03/2010.

    Export Reference in RIS Format     

    Endnote

    • Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".

    Refworks

    • Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References


    Collections
    • Minerva Elements Records [53039]
    • Medical Education - Research Publications [598]
    Minerva AccessDepositing Your Work (for University of Melbourne Staff and Students)NewsFAQs

    BrowseCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    My AccountLoginRegister
    StatisticsMost Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors