Deafness, culture, and choice
No Preview Available
Download
Associated Records
Authors
File Licence
Editors
Date
2002-10-01
Source Title
Journal of Medical Ethics
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
BRITISH MED JOURNAL PUBL GROUP
Melbourne Authors
Affiliation
Philosophy, Anthropology And Social Inquiry
Document Type
Journal Article
Subject Code
Citation
Levy, N. (2002). Deafness, culture, and choice. Journal of Medical Ethics, 28 (5), pp.284-285. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.5.284.
Access Status
Access this item via the Open Access location
Access URL
Open Access URL
Open Access at PMC
Linked Resource URL
NHMRC Grant Code
ARC Grant Code
Description
C1 - Journal Articles Refereed
Abstract
The recent controversy surrounding the choice, by a deaf lesbian couple, to have children who were themselves deaf, has focused attention on the ethics of choosing (apparent) disabilities for children. Deaf activists argue that deafness is not a disability, but instead the constitutive condition of access to a rich culture. Being deaf carries disadvantages with it, but these are a product of discrimination, not of the condition itself. It is, however, implausible to think that all the disadvantages which stem from deafness are social in origin. Moreover, though it may be true that being deaf carries with it the important compensation of access to a rich culture, no physical condition is required for such access. Cultures are simply the kind of things to which we are born, and therefore to which the children of deaf parents, hearing or deaf, normally belong. Thus these parents are making a mistake in choosing deafness for their children. Given their own experience of isolation as children, however, it is a mistake which is understandable, and our reaction to them ought to be compassion, not condemnation.
Notes
Terms of Use
Keywords
Biotechnology not elsewhere classified ; Applied Ethics (incl. Bioethics and Environmental Ethics); Bioethics