Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHermanides, J
dc.contributor.authorPlummer, MP
dc.contributor.authorFinnis, M
dc.contributor.authorDeane, AM
dc.contributor.authorColes, JP
dc.contributor.authorMenon, DK
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-17T04:29:40Z
dc.date.available2020-12-17T04:29:40Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-19
dc.identifierpii: 10.1186/s13054-017-1883-y
dc.identifier.citationHermanides, J., Plummer, M. P., Finnis, M., Deane, A. M., Coles, J. P. & Menon, D. K. (2018). Glycaemic control targets after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CRITICAL CARE, 22 (1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1883-y.
dc.identifier.issn1466-609X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/255334
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Optimal glycaemic targets in traumatic brain injury (TBI) remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intensive with conventional glycaemic control in TBI requiring admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to November 2016. Outcomes of interest included ICU and in-hospital mortality, poor neurological outcome, the incidence of hypoglycaemia and infective complications. Data were analysed by pairwise random effects models with secondary analysis of differing levels of conventional glycaemic control. RESULTS: Ten RCTs, involving 1066 TBI patients were included. Three studies were conducted exclusively in a TBI population, whereas in seven trials, the TBI population was a sub-cohort of a mixed neurocritical or general ICU population. Glycaemic targets with intensive control ranged from 4.4 to 6.7 mmol/L, while conventional targets aimed to keep glucose levels below thresholds of 8.4-12 mmol/L. Conventional versus intensive control showed no association with ICU or hospital mortality (relative risk (RR) (95% CI) 0.93 (0.68-1.27), P = 0.64 and 1.07 (0.84-1.36), P = 0.62, respectively). The risk of a poor neurological outcome was higher with conventional control (RR (95% CI) = 1.10 (1.001-1.24), P = 0.047). However, severe hypoglycaemia occurred less frequently with conventional control (RR (95% CI) = 0.22 (0.09-0.52), P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of intensive glycaemic control shows no association with reduced mortality in TBI. Intensive glucose control showed a borderline significant reduction in the risk of poor neurological outcome, but markedly increased the risk of hypoglycaemia. These contradictory findings should motivate further research.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherBMC
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titleGlycaemic control targets after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13054-017-1883-y
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMedicine (RMH)
melbourne.affiliation.facultyMedicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences
melbourne.source.titleCritical Care (UK)
melbourne.source.volume22
melbourne.source.issue1
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
melbourne.elementsid1338200
melbourne.contributor.authorDeane, Adam
dc.identifier.eissn1364-8535
melbourne.accessrightsOpen Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record