Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHoward, LM
dc.contributor.authorRyan, EG
dc.contributor.authorTrevillion, K
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, F
dc.contributor.authorBick, D
dc.contributor.authorBye, A
dc.contributor.authorByford, S
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, S
dc.contributor.authorSands, P
dc.contributor.authorDemilew, J
dc.contributor.authorMilgrom, J
dc.contributor.authorPickles, A
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-18T03:31:57Z
dc.date.available2020-12-18T03:31:57Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01
dc.identifierpii: S0007125017000095
dc.identifier.citationHoward, L. M., Ryan, E. G., Trevillion, K., Anderson, F., Bick, D., Bye, A., Byford, S., O'Connor, S., Sands, P., Demilew, J., Milgrom, J. & Pickles, A. (2018). Accuracy of the Whooley questions and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in identifying depression and other mental disorders in early pregnancy. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 212 (1), pp.50-56. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2017.9.
dc.identifier.issn0007-1250
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/255808
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: There is limited evidence on the prevalence and identification of antenatal mental disorders. Aims To investigate the prevalence of mental disorders in early pregnancy and the diagnostic accuracy of depression-screening (Whooley) questions compared with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), against the Structured Clinical Interview DSM-IV-TR. METHOD: Cross-sectional survey of women responding to Whooley questions asked at their first antenatal appointment. Women responding positively and a random sample of women responding negatively were invited to participate. RESULTS: Population prevalence was 27% (95% CI 22-32): 11% (95% CI 8-14) depression; 15% (95% CI 11-19) anxiety disorders; 2% (95% CI 1-4) obsessive-compulsive disorder; 0.8% (95% CI 0-1) post-traumatic stress disorder; 2% (95% CI 0.4-3) eating disorders; 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-1) bipolar disorder I, 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-1%) bipolar disorder II; 0.7% (95% CI 0-1) borderline personality disorder. For identification of depression, likelihood ratios were 8.2 (Whooley) and 9.8 (EPDS). Diagnostic accuracy was similar in identifying any disorder (likelihood ratios 5.8 and 6). CONCLUSIONS: Endorsement of Whooley questions in pregnancy indicates the need for a clinical assessment of diagnosis and could be implemented when maternity professionals have been appropriately trained on how to ask the questions sensitively, in settings where a clear referral and care pathway is available. Declaration of interest L.M.H. chaired the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence CG192 guidelines development group on antenatal and postnatal mental health in 2012-2014.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherROYAL COLL PSYCHIATRISTS
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titleAccuracy of the Whooley questions and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in identifying depression and other mental disorders in early pregnancy
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1192/bjp.2017.9
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences
melbourne.source.titleBritish Journal of Psychiatry
melbourne.source.volume212
melbourne.source.issue1
melbourne.source.pages50-56
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
melbourne.elementsid1305938
melbourne.contributor.authorMilgrom, Jeannette
dc.identifier.eissn1472-1465
melbourne.accessrightsOpen Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record