University Library
  • Login
A gateway to Melbourne's research publications
Minerva Access is the University's Institutional Repository. It aims to collect, preserve, and showcase the intellectual output of staff and students of the University of Melbourne for a global audience.
View Item 
  • Minerva Access
  • Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences
  • Melbourne School of Population and Global Health
  • Melbourne School of Population and Global Health - Research Publications
  • View Item
  • Minerva Access
  • Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences
  • Melbourne School of Population and Global Health
  • Melbourne School of Population and Global Health - Research Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations

    Thumbnail
    Download
    Published version (883.1Kb)

    Citations
    Scopus
    Web of Science
    Altmetric
    37
    33
    Author
    Munthe-Kaas, H; Bohren, MA; Glenton, C; Lewin, S; Noyes, J; Tuncalp, O; Booth, A; Garside, R; Colvin, CJ; Wainwright, M; ...
    Date
    2018-01-25
    Source Title
    Implementation Science
    Publisher
    BMC
    University of Melbourne Author/s
    Bohren, Meghan
    Affiliation
    Melbourne School of Population and Global Health
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Document Type
    Journal Article
    Citations
    Munthe-Kaas, H., Bohren, M. A., Glenton, C., Lewin, S., Noyes, J., Tuncalp, O., Booth, A., Garside, R., Colvin, C. J., Wainwright, M., Rashidian, A., Flottorp, S. & Carlsen, B. (2018). Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 13 (Suppl 1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0690-9.
    Access Status
    Open Access
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11343/255939
    DOI
    10.1186/s13012-017-0690-9
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: The GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Working Group. The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evidence syntheses in decision-making, including guideline development and policy formulation. CERQual includes four components for assessing how much confidence to place in findings from reviews of qualitative research (also referred to as qualitative evidence syntheses): (1) methodological limitations, (2) coherence, (3) adequacy of data and (4) relevance. This paper is part of a series providing guidance on how to apply CERQual and focuses on CERQual's methodological limitations component. METHODS: We developed the methodological limitations component by searching the literature for definitions, gathering feedback from relevant research communities and developing consensus through project group meetings. We tested the CERQual methodological limitations component within several qualitative evidence syntheses before agreeing on the current definition and principles for application. RESULTS: When applying CERQual, we define methodological limitations as the extent to which there are concerns about the design or conduct of the primary studies that contributed evidence to an individual review finding. In this paper, we describe the methodological limitations component and its rationale and offer guidance on how to assess methodological limitations of a review finding as part of the CERQual approach. This guidance outlines the information required to assess methodological limitations component, the steps that need to be taken to assess methodological limitations of data contributing to a review finding and examples of methodological limitation assessments. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides guidance for review authors and others on undertaking an assessment of methodological limitations in the context of the CERQual approach. More work is needed to determine which criteria critical appraisal tools should include when assessing methodological limitations. We currently recommend that whichever tool is used, review authors provide a transparent description of their assessments of methodological limitations in a review finding. We expect the CERQual approach and its individual components to develop further as our experiences with the practical implementation of the approach increase.

    Export Reference in RIS Format     

    Endnote

    • Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".

    Refworks

    • Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References


    Collections
    • Minerva Elements Records [53039]
    • Melbourne School of Population and Global Health - Research Publications [5329]
    Minerva AccessDepositing Your Work (for University of Melbourne Staff and Students)NewsFAQs

    BrowseCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    My AccountLoginRegister
    StatisticsMost Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors