Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAllenby, A
dc.contributor.authorKinsman, L
dc.contributor.authorTham, R
dc.contributor.authorSymons, J
dc.contributor.authorJones, M
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, S
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-18T03:59:24Z
dc.date.available2020-12-18T03:59:24Z
dc.date.issued2016-04-01
dc.identifier.citationAllenby, A., Kinsman, L., Tham, R., Symons, J., Jones, M. & Campbell, S. (2016). The quality of cardiovascular disease prevention in rural primary care. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 24 (2), pp.92-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12224.
dc.identifier.issn1038-5282
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/256008
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To measure the differences in the recording of risk factors and lifestyle advice between those at high risk of cardiovascular disease and those diagnosed with cardiovascular disease, and to identify the practice characteristics associated with such recording in rural primary care. DESIGN: A cross-sectional observation study of 14 general practices. Medical records were audited to measure recording of risk factors and lifestyle advice for those at high risk of and those diagnosed with cardiovascular disease. Practice characteristics were collected, with logistic regression used to test for an association with the recording of risk factors. SETTING: General practices in rural Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Each practice was asked to identify 20 patients; 10 at high risk and 10 diagnosed with cardiovascular disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The recording of risk factors and lifestyle advice in patient records and practice characteristics. RESULTS: 282 records were audited with 142 being high risk and 140 diagnosed with cardiovascular disease.Measures recorded significantly less in the high-risk group were: blood pressure (94% versus 99%; P = 0.019); physical activity (24% versus 56%; P = 0.000); dietary advice (32% versus 51%; P = 0.001); and physical activity advice (34% versus 56%; P = 0.000). Recording of risk factors was positively associated with practice involvement in quality improvement (P < 0.001), continuing education (P < 0.001), and greater percentage of general practitioners (P < 0.05) and practice nurses (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial room for enhanced cardiovascular disease prevention through rural primary care in Australia, particularly for high-risk patients. This study has demonstrated an association between practice factors (including targeted education, quality improvement activities and appropriate workforce) and improved preventive activities.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherWILEY-BLACKWELL
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.titleThe quality of cardiovascular disease prevention in rural primary care
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajr.12224
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMelbourne School of Population and Global Health
melbourne.source.titleAustralian Journal of Rural Health
melbourne.source.volume24
melbourne.source.issue2
melbourne.source.pages92-98
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND
melbourne.elementsid1304913
melbourne.contributor.authorTham, Rachel
dc.identifier.eissn1440-1584
melbourne.accessrightsOpen Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record