Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorØverland, G
dc.date.available2014-05-21T19:02:31Z
dc.date.issued2007-09
dc.identifierpii: BIOT570
dc.identifier.citationØverland, G. (2007). Survival lotteries reconsidered.. Bioethics, 21 (7), pp.355-363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00570.x.
dc.identifier.issn0269-9702
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/25608
dc.descriptionC1 - Journal Articles Refereed
dc.description.abstractIn 1975 John Harris envisaged a survival lottery to redistribute organs from one to a greater number in order to reduce number of deaths as a consequence of organ failure. In this paper I reach a conclusion about when running a survival lottery is permissible by looking at the reason prospective participants have for allowing the procedure from a contractual perspective. I identify three versions of the survival lottery. In a National Lottery, everyone within a jurisdiction is a candidate for being a donor for everyone else, disregarding all differences between individuals' eventual possibility of needing an organ. In a Group Specific Lottery, it is a question of running a lottery among members of a specific group who share the same probability of getting organ failure. In a Local Lottery one randomises among individuals who are already in need of a new organ but who happen to be compatible and in need of different organs. While the first is vulnerable to considerations of fairness, it is difficult to perceive a feasible way to implement the second option that does not come with a host of unwelcome consequences. I argue, however, that it is permissible to run Local Lotteries.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectApplied Ethics (incl. Bioethics and Environmental Ethics); Other
dc.titleSurvival lotteries reconsidered.
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00570.x
melbourne.peerreviewPeer Reviewed
melbourne.affiliationThe University of Melbourne
melbourne.affiliation.departmentPhilosophy, Anthropology And Social Inquiry
melbourne.source.titleBioethics
melbourne.source.volume21
melbourne.source.issue7
melbourne.source.pages355-363
melbourne.publicationid125104
melbourne.elementsid310303
melbourne.contributor.authorOVERLAND, GERHARD
dc.identifier.eissn1467-8519
melbourne.accessrightsThis item is currently not available from this repository


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record