Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authord'Errico, A
dc.contributor.authorRicceri, F
dc.contributor.authorStringhini, S
dc.contributor.authorCarmeli, C
dc.contributor.authorKivimaki, M
dc.contributor.authorBartley, M
dc.contributor.authorMcCrory, C
dc.contributor.authorBochud, M
dc.contributor.authorVollenweider, P
dc.contributor.authorTumino, R
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, M
dc.contributor.authorZins, M
dc.contributor.authorBarros, H
dc.contributor.authorGiles, G
dc.contributor.authorSeveri, G
dc.contributor.authorCosta, G
dc.contributor.authorVineis, P
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-18T04:25:51Z
dc.date.available2020-12-18T04:25:51Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-30
dc.identifierpii: PONE-D-16-45168
dc.identifier.citationd'Errico, A., Ricceri, F., Stringhini, S., Carmeli, C., Kivimaki, M., Bartley, M., McCrory, C., Bochud, M., Vollenweider, P., Tumino, R., Goldberg, M., Zins, M., Barros, H., Giles, G., Severi, G., Costa, G. & Vineis, P. (2017). Socioeconomic indicators in epidemiologic research: A practical example from the LIFEPATH study. PLOS ONE, 12 (5), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178071.
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/256190
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Several social indicators have been used in epidemiological research to describe socioeconomic position (SEP) of people in societies. Among SEP indicators, those more frequently used are education, occupational class and income. Differences in the incidence of several health outcomes have been reported consistently, independently from the indicator employed. Main objectives of the study were to present the socioeconomic classifications of the social indicators which will be employed throughout the LIFEPATH project and to compare social gradients in all-cause mortality observed in the participating adult cohorts using the different SEP indicators. METHODS: Information on the available social indicators (education, own and father's occupational class, income) from eleven adult cohorts participating in LIFEPATH was collected and harmonized. Mortality by SEP for each indicator was estimated by Poisson regression on each cohort and then evaluated using a meta-analytical approach. RESULTS: In the meta-analysis, among men mortality was significantly inversely associated with both occupational class and education, but not with father's occupational class; among women, the increase in mortality in lower social strata was smaller than among men and, except for a slight increase in the lowest education category, no significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: Among men, the proposed three-level classifications of occupational class and education were found to predict differences in mortality which is consistent with previous research. Results on women suggest that classifying them through their sole SEP, without considering that of their partners, may imply a misclassification of their social position leading to attenuation of mortality differences.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titleSocioeconomic indicators in epidemiologic research: A practical example from the LIFEPATH study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0178071
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMelbourne School of Population and Global Health
melbourne.source.titlePLoS One
melbourne.source.volume12
melbourne.source.issue5
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
melbourne.elementsid1214428
melbourne.contributor.authorSeveri, Gianluca
melbourne.contributor.authorGiles, Graham
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203
melbourne.accessrightsOpen Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record