Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDalziel, SR
dc.contributor.authorFuryk, J
dc.contributor.authorBonisch, M
dc.contributor.authorOakley, E
dc.contributor.authorBorland, M
dc.contributor.authorNeutze, J
dc.contributor.authorDonath, S
dc.contributor.authorSharpe, C
dc.contributor.authorHarvey, S
dc.contributor.authorDavidson, A
dc.contributor.authorCraig, S
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, N
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, S
dc.contributor.authorRao, A
dc.contributor.authorCheng, N
dc.contributor.authorZhang, M
dc.contributor.authorSinn, K
dc.contributor.authorKochar, A
dc.contributor.authorBrabyn, C
dc.contributor.authorBabl, FE
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-21T01:02:43Z
dc.date.available2020-12-21T01:02:43Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-22
dc.identifierpii: 10.1186/s12887-017-0887-8
dc.identifier.citationDalziel, S. R., Furyk, J., Bonisch, M., Oakley, E., Borland, M., Neutze, J., Donath, S., Sharpe, C., Harvey, S., Davidson, A., Craig, S., Phillips, N., George, S., Rao, A., Cheng, N., Zhang, M., Sinn, K., Kochar, A., Brabyn, C. & Babl, F. E. (2017). A multicentre randomised controlled trial of levetiracetam versus phenytoin for convulsive status epilepticus in children (protocol): Convulsive Status Epilepticus Paediatric Trial (ConSEPT) - a PREDICT study. BMC PEDIATRICS, 17 (1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0887-8.
dc.identifier.issn1471-2431
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/256343
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is the most common life-threatening childhood neurological emergency. Despite this, there is a lack of high quality evidence supporting medication use after first line benzodiazepines, with current treatment protocols based solely on non-experimental evidence and expert opinion. The current standard of care, phenytoin, is only 60% effective, and associated with considerable adverse effects. A newer anti-convulsant, levetiracetam, can be given faster, is potentially more efficacious, with a more tolerable side effect profile. The primary aim of the study presented in this protocol is to determine whether intravenous (IV) levetiracetam or IV phenytoin is the better second line treatment for the emergency management of CSE in children. METHODS/DESIGN: 200 children aged between 3 months and 16 years presenting to 13 emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand with CSE, that has failed to stop with first line benzodiazepines, will be enrolled into this multicentre open randomised controlled trial. Participants will be randomised to 40 mg/kg IV levetiracetam infusion over 5 min or 20 mg/kg IV phenytoin infusion over 20 min. The primary outcome for the study is clinical cessation of seizure activity five minutes following the completion of the infusion of the study medication. Blinded confirmation of the primary outcome will occur with the primary outcome assessment being video recorded and assessed by a primary outcome assessment team blinded to treatment allocation. Secondary outcomes include: Clinical cessation of seizure activity at two hours; Time to clinical seizure cessation; Need for rapid sequence induction; Intensive care unit (ICU) admission; Serious adverse events; Length of Hospital/ICU stay; Health care costs; Seizure status/death at one-month post discharge. DISCUSSION: This paper presents the background, rationale, and design for a randomised controlled trial comparing levetiracetam to phenytoin in children presenting with CSE in whom benzodiazepines have failed. This study will provide the first high quality evidence for management of paediatric CSE post first-line benzodiazepines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12615000129583 (11/2/2015). UTN U1111-1144-5272. ConSEPT protocol version 4 (12/12/2014).
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherBIOMED CENTRAL LTD
dc.titleA multicentre randomised controlled trial of levetiracetam versus phenytoin for convulsive status epilepticus in children (protocol): Convulsive Status Epilepticus Paediatric Trial (ConSEPT) - a PREDICT study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12887-017-0887-8
melbourne.affiliation.departmentPaediatrics (RCH)
melbourne.affiliation.department
melbourne.source.titleBMC Pediatrics
melbourne.source.volume17
melbourne.source.issue1
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
melbourne.elementsid1217002
melbourne.contributor.authorDonath, Susan
melbourne.contributor.authorDavidson, Andrew
melbourne.contributor.authorBabl, Franz
melbourne.contributor.authorOakley, Edward
melbourne.contributor.authorHarvey, Anthony
melbourne.contributor.authorOakley, Edward
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2431
melbourne.accessrightsOpen Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record