Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMorrison, M
dc.contributor.authorKlein, C
dc.contributor.authorClemann, N
dc.contributor.authorCollier, DA
dc.contributor.authorHardy, J
dc.contributor.authorHeisserer, B
dc.contributor.authorCader, MZ
dc.contributor.authorGraf, M
dc.contributor.authorKaye, J
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-21T02:36:42Z
dc.date.available2020-12-21T02:36:42Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-01
dc.identifier.citationMorrison, M., Klein, C., Clemann, N., Collier, D. A., Hardy, J., Heisserer, B., Cader, M. Z., Graf, M. & Kaye, J. (2015). StemBANCC: Governing Access to Material and Data in a Large Stem Cell Research Consortium. STEM CELL REVIEWS AND REPORTS, 11 (5), pp.681-687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-015-9599-3.
dc.identifier.issn1550-8943
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/256996
dc.description.abstractThis paper makes the case for implementing an internal governance framework for sharing materials and data in stem cell research consortia. A governance framework can facilitate a transparent and accountable system while building trust among partner institutions. However, avoiding excessive bureaucracy is essential. The development and implementation of a governance framework for materials and data access in the Stem cells for Biological Assays of Novel drugs and prediCtive toxiCology (StemBANCC) consortium is presented as a practical example. The StemBANCC project is a multi-partner European research consortium, which aims to build a resource of 1,500 well characterised induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines for in vitro disease modelling and toxicology studies. The project governance framework was developed in two stages. A small working group identified key components of a framework and translated the project legal agreements into a draft policy document. The second phase allowed input from all consortium partners to shape the iterative development of a final policy document that could be agreed by all parties. Careful time management strategies were needed to manage the duration of this component. This part of the process also served as an exploratory space where different options could be proposed, potential gaps in planning identified, and project co-ordination activities specified.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherHUMANA PRESS INC
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titleStemBANCC: Governing Access to Material and Data in a Large Stem Cell Research Consortium
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12015-015-9599-3
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMelbourne Law School
melbourne.source.titleStem Cell Reviews
melbourne.source.volume11
melbourne.source.issue5
melbourne.source.pages681-687
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
melbourne.elementsid1236706
melbourne.contributor.authorKaye, Jane
dc.identifier.eissn1558-6804
melbourne.accessrightsOpen Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record