Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPurse, BV
dc.contributor.authorMasante, D
dc.contributor.authorGolding, N
dc.contributor.authorPigott, D
dc.contributor.authorDay, JC
dc.contributor.authorIbanez-Bernal, S
dc.contributor.authorKolb, M
dc.contributor.authorJones, L
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-21T03:37:20Z
dc.date.available2020-12-21T03:37:20Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-11
dc.identifierpii: PONE-D-17-08000
dc.identifier.citationPurse, B. V., Masante, D., Golding, N., Pigott, D., Day, J. C., Ibanez-Bernal, S., Kolb, M. & Jones, L. (2017). How will climate change pathways and mitigation options alter incidence of vector-borne diseases? A framework for leishmaniasis in South and Meso-America. PLOS ONE, 12 (10), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183583.
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/257283
dc.description.abstractThe enormous global burden of vector-borne diseases disproportionately affects poor people in tropical, developing countries. Changes in vector-borne disease impacts are often linked to human modification of ecosystems as well as climate change. For tropical ecosystems, the health impacts of future environmental and developmental policy depend on how vector-borne disease risks trade off against other ecosystem services across heterogeneous landscapes. By linking future socio-economic and climate change pathways to dynamic land use models, this study is amongst the first to analyse and project impacts of both land use and climate change on continental-scale patterns in vector-borne diseases. Models were developed for cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis in the Americas-ecologically complex sand fly borne infections linked to tropical forests and diverse wild and domestic mammal hosts. Both diseases were hypothesised to increase with available interface habitat between forest and agricultural or domestic habitats and with mammal biodiversity. However, landscape edge metrics were not important as predictors of leishmaniasis. Models including mammal richness were similar in accuracy and predicted disease extent to models containing only climate and land use predictors. Overall, climatic factors explained 80% and land use factors only 20% of the variance in past disease patterns. Both diseases, but especially cutaneous leishmaniasis, were associated with low seasonality in temperature and precipitation. Since such seasonality increases under future climate change, particularly under strong climate forcing, both diseases were predicted to contract in geographical extent to 2050, with cutaneous leishmaniasis contracting by between 35% and 50%. Whilst visceral leishmaniasis contracted slightly more under strong than weak management for carbon, biodiversity and ecosystem services, future cutaneous leishmaniasis extent was relatively insensitive to future alternative socio-economic pathways. Models parameterised at narrower geographical scales may be more sensitive to land use pattern and project more substantial changes in disease extent under future alternative socio-economic pathways.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titleHow will climate change pathways and mitigation options alter incidence of vector-borne diseases? A framework for leishmaniasis in South and Meso-America
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0183583
melbourne.affiliation.departmentSchool of BioSciences
melbourne.source.titlePLoS One
melbourne.source.volume12
melbourne.source.issue10
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
melbourne.elementsid1255525
melbourne.contributor.authorGolding, Nicholas
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203
melbourne.identifier.fundernameidUNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE
melbourne.accessrightsOpen Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record