Standardized mean differences cause funnel plot distortion in publication bias assessments.
AuthorZwetsloot, P-P; Van Der Naald, M; Sena, ES; Howells, DW; IntHout, J; De Groot, JA; Chamuleau, SA; MacLeod, MR; Wever, KE
PublishereLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
University of Melbourne Author/sHowells, David
AffiliationMedicine and Radiology
Document TypeJournal Article
CitationsZwetsloot, P. -P., Van Der Naald, M., Sena, E. S., Howells, D. W., IntHout, J., De Groot, J. A., Chamuleau, S. A., MacLeod, M. R. & Wever, K. E. (2017). Standardized mean differences cause funnel plot distortion in publication bias assessments.. Elife, 6, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24260.
Access StatusOpen Access
Open Access at PMChttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5621838
Meta-analyses are increasingly used for synthesis of evidence from biomedical research, and often include an assessment of publication bias based on visual or analytical detection of asymmetry in funnel plots. We studied the influence of different normalisation approaches, sample size and intervention effects on funnel plot asymmetry, using empirical datasets and illustrative simulations. We found that funnel plots of the Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) plotted against the standard error (SE) are susceptible to distortion, leading to overestimation of the existence and extent of publication bias. Distortion was more severe when the primary studies had a small sample size and when an intervention effect was present. We show that using the Normalised Mean Difference measure as effect size (when possible), or plotting the SMD against a sample size-based precision estimate, are more reliable alternatives. We conclude that funnel plots using the SMD in combination with the SE are unsuitable for publication bias assessments and can lead to false-positive results.
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References