University Library
  • Login
A gateway to Melbourne's research publications
Minerva Access is the University's Institutional Repository. It aims to collect, preserve, and showcase the intellectual output of staff and students of the University of Melbourne for a global audience.
View Item 
  • Minerva Access
  • Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences
  • Melbourne School of Health Sciences
  • Physiotherapy
  • Physiotherapy - Research Publications
  • View Item
  • Minerva Access
  • Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences
  • Melbourne School of Health Sciences
  • Physiotherapy
  • Physiotherapy - Research Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Validation and inter-rater reliability of a three item falls risk screening tool

    Thumbnail
    Download
    published version (477.0Kb)

    Citations
    Altmetric
    Author
    Said, CM; Churilov, L; Shaw, K
    Date
    2017-11-23
    Source Title
    BMC Geriatrics
    Publisher
    BMC
    University of Melbourne Author/s
    Said, Catherine; Churilov, Leonid
    Affiliation
    Physiotherapy
    Medicine and Radiology
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Document Type
    Journal Article
    Citations
    Said, C. M., Churilov, L. & Shaw, K. (2017). Validation and inter-rater reliability of a three item falls risk screening tool. BMC GERIATRICS, 17 (1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0669-z.
    Access Status
    Open Access
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11343/257607
    DOI
    10.1186/s12877-017-0669-z
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: Falls screening tools are routinely used in hospital settings and the psychometric properties of tools should be examined in the setting in which they are used. The aim of this study was to explore the concurrent and predictive validity of the Austin Health Falls Risk Screening Tool (AHFRST), compared with The Northern Hospital Modified St Thomas's Risk Assessment Tool (TNH-STRATIFY), and the inter-rater reliability of the AHFRST. METHODS: A research physiotherapist used the AHFRST and TNH-STRATIFY to classify 130 participants admitted to Austin Health (five acute wards, n = 115 two subacute wards n = 15; median length of stay 6 days IQR 3-12) as 'High' or 'Low' falls risk. The AHFRST was also completed by nursing staff on patient admission. Falls data was collected from the hospital incident reporting system. RESULTS: Six falls occurred during the study period (fall rate of 4.6 falls per 1000 bed days). There was substantial agreement between the AHFRST and the TNH-STRATIFY (Kappa = 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.78). Both tools had poor predictive validity, with low specificity (AHFRST 46.0%, 95% CI 37.0-55.1; TNH-STRATIFY 34.7%, 95% CI 26.4-43.7) and positive predictive values (AHFRST 5.6%, 95% CI 1.6-13.8; TNH-STRATIFY 6.9%, 95% CI 2.6-14.4). The AHFRST showed moderate inter-rater reliability (Kappa = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.36-0.67, p < 0.001) although 18 patients did not have the AHFRST completed by nursing staff. CONCLUSIONS: There was an acceptable level of agreement between the 3 item AHFRST classification of falls risk and the longer, 9 item TNH-STRATIFY classification. However, both tools demonstrated limited predictive validity in the Austin Health population. The results highlight the importance of evaluating the validity of falls screening tools, and the clinical utility of these tools should be reconsidered.

    Export Reference in RIS Format     

    Endnote

    • Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".

    Refworks

    • Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References


    Collections
    • Minerva Elements Records [45770]
    • Medicine and Radiology - Research Publications [2347]
    • Physiotherapy - Research Publications [391]
    Minerva AccessDepositing Your Work (for University of Melbourne Staff and Students)NewsFAQs

    BrowseCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    My AccountLoginRegister
    StatisticsMost Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors