University Library
  • Login
A gateway to Melbourne's research publications
Minerva Access is the University's Institutional Repository. It aims to collect, preserve, and showcase the intellectual output of staff and students of the University of Melbourne for a global audience.
View Item 
  • Minerva Access
  • University Services
  • University General - Research Publications
  • View Item
  • Minerva Access
  • University Services
  • University General - Research Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The involvement of patient organisations in rare disease research: a mixed methods study in Australia

    Thumbnail
    Download
    Published version (753.2Kb)

    Citations
    Scopus
    Web of Science
    Altmetric
    20
    18
    Author
    Pinto, D; Martin, D; Chenhall, R
    Date
    2016-01-12
    Source Title
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
    Publisher
    BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
    University of Melbourne Author/s
    MARTIN, DARREN; Chenhall, Richard; Martin, Dominique
    Affiliation
    University General
    Melbourne School of Population and Global Health
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Document Type
    Journal Article
    Citations
    Pinto, D., Martin, D. & Chenhall, R. (2016). The involvement of patient organisations in rare disease research: a mixed methods study in Australia. ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 11 (1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0382-6.
    Access Status
    Open Access
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11343/258090
    DOI
    10.1186/s13023-016-0382-6
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: We report here selected findings from a mixed-methods study investigating the role of Australian rare disease patient organisations (RDPOs) in research. Despite there being many examples of RDPOs that have initiated and supported significant scientific advances, there is little information - and none at all in Australia - about RDPOs generally, and their research-related goals, activities, and experiences. This information is a pre-requisite for understanding what RDPOs bring to research and how their involvement could be strengthened. METHODS: We reviewed 112 RDPO websites, conducted an online survey completed by 61 organisational leaders, and interviewed ten leaders and two key informants. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using basic descriptive statistics and content analysis, respectively. RESULTS: Although most are small volunteer-based groups, more than 90% of the surveyed RDPOs had a goal to promote or support research on the diseases affecting their members. Nearly all (95 %) had undertaken at least one research-related activity - such as providing funding or other support to researchers - in the previous five years. However, RDPO leaders reported considerable challenges in meeting their research goals. Difficulties most frequently identified were insufficient RDPO resources, and a perceived lack of researchers interested in studying their diseases. Other concerns included inadequate RDPO expertise in governing research "investments", and difficulty engaging researchers in the organisation's knowledge and ideas. We discuss these perceived challenges in the light of two systemic issues: the proliferation of and lack of collaboration between RDPOs, and the lack of specific governmental policies and resources supporting rare disease research and patient advocacy in Australia. CONCLUSION: This study provides unique information about the experiences of RDPOs generally, rather than experiences retrospectively reported by RDPOs associated with successful research. We describe RDPOs' valuable contributions to research, while also providing insights into the difficulties for small organisations trying to promote research. The study is relevant internationally because of what it tells us about RDPOs; however, we draw attention to specific opportunities in Australia to support RDPOs' involvement in research, for the benefit of current and future generations affected by rare diseases.

    Export Reference in RIS Format     

    Endnote

    • Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".

    Refworks

    • Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References


    Collections
    • Minerva Elements Records [45770]
    • Melbourne School of Population and Global Health - Research Publications [4369]
    • University General - Research Publications [290]
    Minerva AccessDepositing Your Work (for University of Melbourne Staff and Students)NewsFAQs

    BrowseCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    My AccountLoginRegister
    StatisticsMost Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors