Equifinality and process-based modelling
AuthorKhatami, S; Peel, M; Peterson, T; Western, A
Source TitleAGU 2017 Fall Meeting
PublisherAmerican Geophysical Union
University of Melbourne Author/sKhatami Mashhadi, Sina; Western, Andrew; Peel, Murray; Peterson, Tim
Document TypeConference Paper
CitationsKhatami, S., Peel, M., Peterson, T. & Western, A. (2018). Equifinality and process-based modelling. AGU 2017 Fall Meeting, American Geophysical Union. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10500070.1.
Access StatusAccess this item via the Open Access location
Open Access URLhttps://www.essoar.org/doi/10.1002/essoar.10500070.1
Equifinality is understood as one of the fundamental difficulties in the study of open complex systems, including catchment hydrology. A review of the hydrologic literature reveals that the term equifinality has been widely used, but in many cases inconsistently and without coherent recognition of the various facets of equifinality, which can lead to ambiguity but also methodological fallacies. Therefore, in this study we first characterise the term equifinality within the context of hydrological modelling by reviewing the genesis of the concept of equifinality and then presenting a theoretical framework. During past decades, equifinality has mainly been studied as a subset of aleatory (arising due to randomness) uncertainty and for the assessment of model parameter uncertainty. Although the connection between parameter uncertainty and equifinality is undeniable, we argue there is more to equifinality than just aleatory parameter uncertainty. That is, the importance of equifinality and epistemic uncertainty (arising due to lack of knowledge) and their implications is overlooked in our current practice of model evaluation. Equifinality and epistemic uncertainty in studying, modelling, and evaluating hydrologic processes are treated as if they can be simply discussed in (or often reduced to) probabilistic terms (as for aleatory uncertainty). The deficiencies of this approach to conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling are demonstrated for selected Australian catchments by examination of parameter and internal flux distributions and interactions within SIMHYD. On this basis, we present a new approach that expands equifinality concept beyond model parameters to inform epistemic uncertainty. The new approach potentially facilitates the identification and development of more physically plausible models and model evaluation schemes particularly within the multiple working hypotheses framework, and is generalisable to other fields of environmental modelling as well.
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References