Equifinality and process-based modelling
Citations
Altmetric
Author
Khatami, S; Peel, M; Peterson, T; Western, ADate
2018-11-26Source Title
AGU 2017 Fall MeetingPublisher
American Geophysical UnionUniversity of Melbourne Author/s
Khatami Mashhadi, Sina; Western, Andrew; Peel, Murray; Peterson, TimAffiliation
Infrastructure EngineeringMetadata
Show full item recordDocument Type
Conference PaperCitations
Khatami, S., Peel, M., Peterson, T. & Western, A. (2018). Equifinality and process-based modelling. AGU 2017 Fall Meeting, American Geophysical Union. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10500070.1.Access Status
Access this item via the Open Access locationOpen Access URL
https://www.essoar.org/doi/10.1002/essoar.10500070.1Abstract
Equifinality is understood as one of the fundamental difficulties in the study of open complex systems, including catchment hydrology. A review of the hydrologic literature reveals that the term equifinality has been widely used, but in many cases inconsistently and without coherent recognition of the various facets of equifinality, which can lead to ambiguity but also methodological fallacies. Therefore, in this study we first characterise the term equifinality within the context of hydrological modelling by reviewing the genesis of the concept of equifinality and then presenting a theoretical framework. During past decades, equifinality has mainly been studied as a subset of aleatory (arising due to randomness) uncertainty and for the assessment of model parameter uncertainty. Although the connection between parameter uncertainty and equifinality is undeniable, we argue there is more to equifinality than just aleatory parameter uncertainty. That is, the importance of equifinality and epistemic uncertainty (arising due to lack of knowledge) and their implications is overlooked in our current practice of model evaluation. Equifinality and epistemic uncertainty in studying, modelling, and evaluating hydrologic processes are treated as if they can be simply discussed in (or often reduced to) probabilistic terms (as for aleatory uncertainty). The deficiencies of this approach to conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling are demonstrated for selected Australian catchments by examination of parameter and internal flux distributions and interactions within SIMHYD. On this basis, we present a new approach that expands equifinality concept beyond model parameters to inform epistemic uncertainty. The new approach potentially facilitates the identification and development of more physically plausible models and model evaluation schemes particularly within the multiple working hypotheses framework, and is generalisable to other fields of environmental modelling as well.
Export Reference in RIS Format
Endnote
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".
Refworks
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References