Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoas, T
dc.contributor.authorBogena, H
dc.contributor.authorGrünwald, T
dc.contributor.authorHeinesch, B
dc.contributor.authorRyu, D
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, M
dc.contributor.authorVereecken, H
dc.contributor.authorWestern, A
dc.contributor.authorHendricks-Franssen, H-J
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-04T07:16:40Z
dc.date.available2021-01-04T07:16:40Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBoas, T., Bogena, H., Grünwald, T., Heinesch, B., Ryu, D., Schmidt, M., Vereecken, H., Western, A. & Hendricks-Franssen, H. -J. (2020). Improving the representation of cropland sites in the Community Land Model (CLM) version 5.0. Geoscientific Model Development, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-241.
dc.identifier.issn1991-9611
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/258538
dc.description.abstractThe incorporation of a comprehensive crop module in land surface models offers the possibility to study the effect of agricultural land use and land management changes on the terrestrial water, energy and biogeochemical cycles. It may help to improve the simulation of biogeophysical and biogeochemical processes on regional and global scales in the framework of climate and land use change. In this study, the performance of the crop module of the Community Land Model version 5 (CLM5) was evaluated at point scale with site specific field data focussing on the simulation of seasonal and inter-annual variations in crop growth, planting and harvesting cycles, and crop yields as well as water, energy and carbon fluxes. In order to better represent agricultural sites, the model was modified by (1) implementing the winter wheat subroutines after Lu et al. (2017) in CLM5; (2) implementing plant specific parameters for sugar beet, potatoes and winter wheat, thereby adding these crop functional types (CFT) to the list of actively managed crops in CLM5; (3) introducing a cover cropping subroutine that allows multiple crop types on the same column within one year. The latter modification allows the simulation of cropping during winter months before usual cash crop planting begins in spring, which is a common agricultural management technique in humid and sub-humid regions. We compared simulation results with field data and found that both the parameterization of the CFTs, as well as the winter wheat subroutines, led to a significant simulation improvement in terms of energy fluxes, leaf area index (LAI), net ecosystem exchange (RMSE reduction for latent and sensible heat by up to 57 % and 59 % respectively) and crop yield (up to 87 % improvement in winter wheat yield prediction) compared with default model results. The cover cropping subroutine yielded a substantial improvement in representation of field conditions after harvest of the main cash crop (winter season) in terms of LAI curve and latent heat flux (reduction of winter time RMSE for latent heat flux by 42 %). We anticipate that our model modifications offer opportunities to improve yield predictions, to study the effects of large-scale cover cropping on energy fluxes, soil carbon and nitrogen pools, and soil water storage in future studies with CLM5.
dc.publisherCopernicus Publications
dc.titleImproving the representation of cropland sites in the Community Land Model (CLM) version 5.0
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/gmd-2020-241
melbourne.affiliation.departmentInfrastructure Engineering
melbourne.source.titleGeoscientific Model Development Discussions
melbourne.source.titleGeoscientific Model Development
melbourne.elementsid1461326
melbourne.openaccess.urlhttps://gmd.copernicus.org/preprints/gmd-2020-241/
melbourne.contributor.authorRyu, Dongryeol
melbourne.contributor.authorWestern, Andrew
melbourne.accessrightsOpen Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record