Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrugler, J
dc.contributor.authorComerton-Forde, C
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-06T00:15:33Z
dc.date.available2021-01-06T00:15:33Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-01
dc.identifier.citationBrugler, J. & Comerton-Forde, C. (2021). Comment on: Price Discovery in High Resolution. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS, 19 (3), pp.431-438. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbz005.
dc.identifier.issn1479-8409
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/258561
dc.description.abstractThe microstructure literature comprises a rich set of papers that seek to understand pricing dynamics at a granular level, commonly exploring the joint dynamics of bids, asks and last sale prices. Its focus is on identifying innovations in prices and separating permanent price impacts from transient effects. Hasbrouck (1995) provides a tool that has been extensively utilized in the literature to examine these dynamics in many different market contexts over the last two decades.1 However, the evolution of markets over this period, most notably the exponential growth in the volume of data and the increasing importance of trading speed has made the application of Hasbrouck’s (1995) method and other related tools discussed in Hasbrouck (2018) more computationally and econometrically challenging. Hasbrouck (2018) offers a new approach to help overcome these challenges. In this comment, we briefly describe the evolution of markets and detail the challenges that these changes create for microstructure researchers and highlight the solution that Hasbrouck (2018) offers for these problems. We survey the literature that uses linear multivariate time-series models to understand high-frequency markets. We focus on three examples from the literature to discuss how estimation constraints have affected their modelling choices, describe the potential drawbacks of these choices and how Hasbrouck’s (2018) method can alleviate these constraints. We deliberately select papers that cover different asset classes: cash equities, fixed income and equity options. We hope that our discussion will help provide guidance about the costs and benefits of different modelling choices for future researchers confronted with a variety of methods to answer related research questions. We conclude by considering the implications of Hasbrouck’s 2018 paper for the current policy debate on market data costs.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherOXFORD UNIV PRESS
dc.titleComment on: Price Discovery in High Resolution
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jjfinec/nbz005
melbourne.affiliation.departmentFinance
melbourne.source.titleJournal of Financial Econometrics
melbourne.source.volume19
melbourne.source.issue3
melbourne.source.pages431-438
melbourne.elementsid1416707
melbourne.internal.embargodate2022-03-11
melbourne.contributor.authorBrugler, James
dc.identifier.eissn1479-8417
melbourne.accessrightsThis item is embargoed and will be available on 2022-03-11


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record