Reuse of terminological resources for efficient ontological engineering in Life Sciences.
AuthorJimeno-Yepes, A; Jiménez-Ruiz, E; Berlanga-Llavori, R; Rebholz-Schuhmann, D
Source TitleBMC Bioinformatics
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
University of Melbourne Author/sJimeno Yepes, Antonio
AffiliationComputing and Information Systems
Document TypeJournal Article
CitationsJimeno-Yepes, A., Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Berlanga-Llavori, R. & Rebholz-Schuhmann, D. (2009). Reuse of terminological resources for efficient ontological engineering in Life Sciences.. BMC Bioinformatics, 10 Suppl 10 (SUPPL. 10), pp.S4-. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-S10-S4.
Access StatusOpen Access
Open Access at PMChttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2755825
This paper is intended to explore how to use terminological resources for ontology engineering. Nowadays there are several biomedical ontologies describing overlapping domains, but there is not a clear correspondence between the concepts that are supposed to be equivalent or just similar. These resources are quite precious but their integration and further development are expensive. Terminologies may support the ontological development in several stages of the lifecycle of the ontology; e.g. ontology integration. In this paper we investigate the use of terminological resources during the ontology lifecycle. We claim that the proper creation and use of a shared thesaurus is a cornerstone for the successful application of the Semantic Web technology within life sciences. Moreover, we have applied our approach to a real scenario, the Health-e-Child (HeC) project, and we have evaluated the impact of filtering and re-organizing several resources. As a result, we have created a reference thesaurus for this project, named HeCTh.
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References