Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPierre, TGS
dc.contributor.authorHouse, MJ
dc.contributor.authorBangma, SJ
dc.contributor.authorPang, W
dc.contributor.authorBathgate, A
dc.contributor.authorGan, EK
dc.contributor.authorAyonrinde, OT
dc.contributor.authorBhathal, PS
dc.contributor.authorClouston, A
dc.contributor.authorOlynyk, JK
dc.contributor.authorAdams, LA
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-04T00:36:32Z
dc.date.available2021-02-04T00:36:32Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-08
dc.identifierpii: PONE-D-16-16259
dc.identifier.citationPierre, T. G. S., House, M. J., Bangma, S. J., Pang, W., Bathgate, A., Gan, E. K., Ayonrinde, O. T., Bhathal, P. S., Clouston, A., Olynyk, J. K. & Adams, L. A. (2016). Stereological Analysis of Liver Biopsy Histology Sections as a Reference Standard for Validating Non-Invasive Liver Fat Fraction Measurements by MRI. PLOS ONE, 11 (8), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160789.
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/259145
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND AIMS: Validation of non-invasive methods of liver fat quantification requires a reference standard. However, using standard histopathology assessment of liver biopsies is problematical because of poor repeatability. We aimed to assess a stereological method of measuring volumetric liver fat fraction (VLFF) in liver biopsies and to use the method to validate a magnetic resonance imaging method for measurement of VLFF. METHODS: VLFFs were measured in 59 subjects (1) by three independent analysts using a stereological point counting technique combined with the Delesse principle on liver biopsy histological sections and (2) by three independent analysts using the HepaFat-Scan® technique on magnetic resonance images of the liver. Bland Altman statistics and intraclass correlation (IC) were used to assess the repeatability of each method and the bias between the methods of liver fat fraction measurement. RESULTS: Inter-analyst repeatability coefficients for the stereology and HepaFat-Scan® methods were 8.2 (95% CI 7.7-8.8)% and 2.4 (95% CI 2.2-2.5)% VLFF respectively. IC coefficients were 0.86 (95% CI 0.69-0.93) and 0.990 (95% CI 0.985-0.994) respectively. Small biases (≤3.4%) were observable between two pairs of analysts using stereology while no significant biases were observable between any of the three pairs of analysts using HepaFat-Scan®. A bias of 1.4±0.5% VLFF was observed between the HepaFat-Scan® method and the stereological method. CONCLUSIONS: Repeatability of the stereological method is superior to the previously reported performance of assessment of hepatic steatosis by histopathologists and is a suitable reference standard for validating non-invasive methods of measurement of VLFF.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titleStereological Analysis of Liver Biopsy Histology Sections as a Reference Standard for Validating Non-Invasive Liver Fat Fraction Measurements by MRI
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0160789
melbourne.affiliation.departmentClinical Pathology
melbourne.affiliation.facultyMedicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences
melbourne.source.titlePLoS One
melbourne.source.volume11
melbourne.source.issue8
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
melbourne.elementsid1201464
melbourne.contributor.authorBhathal, Prithvipall
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203
melbourne.accessrightsOpen Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record