Effect sizes in ongoing randomized controlled critical care trials
Web of Science
AuthorRidgeon, EE; Bellomo, R; Aberegg, SK; Mac Sweeney, R; Varughese, RS; Landoni, G; Young, PJ
Source TitleCritical Care (UK)
University of Melbourne Author/sBellomo, Rinaldo
AffiliationMelbourne Medical School
Document TypeJournal Article
CitationsRidgeon, E. E., Bellomo, R., Aberegg, S. K., Mac Sweeney, R., Varughese, R. S., Landoni, G. & Young, P. J. (2017). Effect sizes in ongoing randomized controlled critical care trials. CRITICAL CARE, 21 (1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1726-x.
Access StatusOpen Access
BACKGROUND: An important limitation of many critical care trial designs is that they hypothesize large, and potentially implausible, reductions in mortality. Interpretation of trial results could be improved by systematic assessment of the plausibility of trial hypotheses; however, such assessment has not been attempted in the field of critical care medicine. The purpose of this study was to determine clinicians' views about prior probabilities and plausible effect sizes for ongoing critical care trials where the primary endpoint is landmark mortality. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of clinical trial registries in September 2015 to identify ongoing critical care medicine trials where landmark mortality was the primary outcome, followed by a clinician survey to obtain opinions about ten large trials. Clinicians were asked to estimate the probability that each trial would demonstrate a mortality effect equal to or larger than that used in its sample size calculations. RESULTS: Estimates provided by individual clinicians varied from 0% to 100% for most trials, with a median estimate of 15% (IQR 10-20%). The median largest absolute mortality reduction considered plausible was 4.5% (IQR 3.5-5%), compared with a median absolute mortality reduction used in sample size calculations of 5% (IQR 3.6-10%) (P = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: For some of the largest ongoing critical care trials, many clinicians regard prior probabilities as low and consider that plausible effects on absolute mortality are less than 5%. Further work is needed to determine whether pooled estimates obtained by surveying clinicians are replicable and accurate or whether other methods of estimating prior probability are preferred.
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References