Increasing the Spatial Resolution of Visual Field Tests Without Increasing Test Duration: An Evaluation of ARREST
AuthorMuthusamy, V; Turpin, A; Walland, MJ; Nguyen, BN; McKendrick, AM
Source TitleTranslational Vision Science and Technology
PublisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
AffiliationOptometry and Vision Sciences
Document TypeJournal Article
CitationsMuthusamy, V., Turpin, A., Walland, M. J., Nguyen, B. N. & McKendrick, A. M. (2020). Increasing the Spatial Resolution of Visual Field Tests Without Increasing Test Duration: An Evaluation of ARREST. Translational Vision Science and Technology, 9 (13), pp.1-13. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.13.24.
Access StatusOpen Access
Open Access URLhttps://tvst.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2772073
Open Access at PMChttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745600
ARC Grant codeARC/LP150100815
Purpose: The Australian Reduced Range Extended Spatial Test (ARREST) approach was designed to improve visual field spatial resolution while maintaining a similar test duration to clinically used testing algorithms. ARREST does not completely threshold visual field locations with sensitivity < 17 dB, and uses the presentations saved to test new locations in areas of steep gradient within the visual field. Previous assessments of ARREST's performance have used computer simulation. In this study, we cross-sectionally assessed the performance of ARREST in people with visual field loss. Methods: We tested 23 people with glaucoma (mean age: 71 ± 8 years) with established visual field loss. Three visual field procedures were performed using the Open Perimetry Interface: cZEST and ARREST on the Octopus 900 perimeter (Haag-Streit AG, Switzerland), and a reference standard (best available estimate [BAE]) on the Compass perimeter (CenterVue SpA, Italy). ARREST was compared against the cZEST and the BAE. Results: On average, ARREST added seven new locations (range = 0-15) to a visual field test. There was no significant difference in the number of stimulus presentations between procedures (mean = 259 ± 25 [ARREST] vs. 261 ± 25 [cZEST], P = 0.78). In classifying threshold values < 17 dB, ARREST performed similarly when compared against BAE. Conclusions: This study provides empirical evidence to support conclusions from previous computer simulations that ARREST can be used to increase spatial sampling in regions of interest without increasing test time. Translational Relevance: ARREST is a new approach that augments current visual field testing procedures to provide better spatial description of visual field defects without increasing test duration.
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References