Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLewandowsky, S
dc.contributor.authorDennis, S
dc.contributor.authorPerfors, A
dc.contributor.authorKashima, Y
dc.contributor.authorWhite, JP
dc.contributor.authorGarrett, P
dc.contributor.authorLittle, DR
dc.contributor.authorYesilada, M
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-23T05:53:15Z
dc.date.available2021-02-23T05:53:15Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-22
dc.identifierpii: PONE-D-20-26680
dc.identifier.citationLewandowsky, S., Dennis, S., Perfors, A., Kashima, Y., White, J. P., Garrett, P., Little, D. R. & Yesilada, M. (2021). Public acceptance of privacy-encroaching policies to address the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. PLOS ONE, 16 (1), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245740.
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/265157
dc.description.abstractThe nature of the COVID-19 pandemic may require governments to use privacy-encroaching technologies to help contain its spread. One technology involves co-location tracking through mobile Wi-Fi, GPS, and Bluetooth to permit health agencies to monitor people's contact with each other, thereby triggering targeted social-distancing when a person turns out to be infected. The effectiveness of tracking relies on the willingness of the population to support such privacy encroaching measures. We report the results of two large surveys in the United Kingdom, conducted during the peak of the pandemic, that probe people's attitudes towards various tracking technologies. The results show that by and large there is widespread acceptance for co-location tracking. Acceptance increases when the measures are explicitly time-limited and come with opt-out clauses or other assurances of privacy. Another possible future technology to control the pandemic involves "immunity passports", which could be issued to people who carry antibodies for the COVID-19 virus, potentially implying that they are immune and therefore unable to spread the virus to other people. Immunity passports have been considered as a potential future step to manage the pandemic. We probe people's attitudes towards immunity passports and find considerable support overall, although around 20% of the public strongly oppose passports.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titlePublic acceptance of privacy-encroaching policies to address the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0245740
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences
melbourne.source.titlePLoS One
melbourne.source.volume16
melbourne.source.issue1
melbourne.source.pagese0245740-
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
melbourne.elementsid1492794
melbourne.openaccess.pmchttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822290
melbourne.contributor.authorKashima, Yoshihisa
melbourne.contributor.authorLittle, Daniel
melbourne.contributor.authorGarrett, Paul
melbourne.contributor.authorDennis, Simon
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203
melbourne.accessrightsOpen Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record