Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTew, Michelle Siew Ping
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-21T02:15:19Z
dc.date.available2021-04-21T02:15:19Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/268330
dc.description© 2020 Michelle Siew Ping Tew
dc.description.abstractHealth economic evaluation is a fundamental component in helping inform health care providers and policy makers in making decisions on priorities in health care. This is particularly relevant in today’s tight budgetary climate and in response to continued calls for sustainable health care systems. Economic evaluation evidence has influenced and contributed to many areas of health policy making, at all levels of the health care system – from shaping guidelines that guide clinical care to informing decision for subsidy of pharmaceuticals and medical services. For these evaluations to be useful to decisions makers, they need to provide useful and reliable information and to achieve this, methodological guidelines should be followed, and robust evidence of effectiveness and cost is paramount. With recent advances in information technology, data and statistical methods and implementation of electronic health records, health decision makers are increasingly seeking real-world, generalisable evidences to complement and support policy and clinical decisions. This thesis aims to demonstrate the usefulness and practicality of applying real-world longitudinal data in health economics research and applications. It features six individual health economics studies which explore longitudinal data and show their value and contribution towards advancing economic evaluation methodologies and better decision making. Each of the studies answer specific research questions and contribute to the research literature through methodological research to improve consistency in extrapolating costs, utility inputs and modelling long-term outcomes, generating robust evidence for resource allocation decisions, promoting a better understanding of real-world heterogeneity and approaches to optimise patient outcomes. Collectively, these studies highlight important variations in the cost and outcomes of health care delivery in real-world settings, provide useful insights into the implications of such variations and demonstration of translating research findings to implementation.
dc.rightsTerms and Conditions: Copyright in works deposited in Minerva Access is retained by the copyright owner. The work may not be altered without permission from the copyright owner. Readers may only download, print and save electronic copies of whole works for their own personal non-commercial use. Any use that exceeds these limits requires permission from the copyright owner. Attribution is essential when quoting or paraphrasing from these works.
dc.subjecthealth economics
dc.subjectcost-effectiveness
dc.subjectpatient-reported outcomes
dc.subjectcost analysis
dc.subjecteconomic evaluations
dc.subjectorthopaedic surgery
dc.subjectsepsis
dc.subjectcancer
dc.subjectvalue-based care
dc.titleAdvancing economic evaluation methods for better medical decision making through real-world, longitudinal data
dc.typePhD thesis
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMelbourne School of Population and Global Health
melbourne.affiliation.facultyMedicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences
melbourne.thesis.supervisornameKim Dalziel
melbourne.contributor.authorTew, Michelle Siew Ping
melbourne.thesis.supervisorothernameMichelle Dowsey
melbourne.thesis.supervisorothernameKarin Thursky
melbourne.thesis.supervisorothernamePhilip Clarke
melbourne.tes.fieldofresearch1380108 Health economics
melbourne.tes.fieldofresearch2440706 Health policy
melbourne.accessrightsOpen Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record