Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation
AuthorShepherd, R. K.; Hatsushika, S.; Clark, Graeme M.
Source TitleHearing Research
Document TypeJournal Article
CitationsShepherd, R. K., Hatsushika, S., & Clark, G. M. (1993). Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hearing Research, November, 66, 108-120.
Access StatusThis item is currently not available from this repository
Publisher’s permission requested and denied.
Histological studies have shown that the Melbourne/Cochlear electrode array lies along the outer wall of the scala tympani and is therefore some distance from the residual VIIIth nerve elements. In order to investigate the influence of electrode position on neural excitation we systematically varied the position of the electrode array within the cat scala tympani while recording electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs). Using both normal hearing and long-term deafened animals, we observed significant reductions in EABR thresholds as the electrode array was moved from the outer wall towards the modiolus. Further threshold reductions were observed when the array was placed underneath the osseous spiral lamina (OSL) close to the peripheral dendrites. These changes were independent of the bipolar inter-electrode separation, and were observed over a wide range of cochlear pathologies varying from normal to a moderate spiral ganglion cell loss. Interestingly, the one animal exhibiting extensive neural loss showed no correlation between EABR threshold and electrode position. There was also a general decrease in the gradient of the EABR input-output function as the electrode array was moved closer to the neural elements. This was, however, only statistically significant when the electrode was positioned adjacent to the peripheral dendrites. Significant reductions in EABR threshold were also observed as the inter-electrode spacing of the bipolar electrodes was increased. The gradient of the EABR input-output function also increased with increasing inter-electrode spacing, although again, this was only significant when the electrode array was positioned close to the neural elements. The present results indicate that the optimum placement of a Melbourne/Cochlear electrode array is adjacent to the peripheral dendrites. However, such a site would be difficult to achieve in practice while minimizing insertion trauma. An array lying adjacent to the modiolus would be a safe alternative while ensuring a significant reduction in threshold compared with the existing site (outer wall). This placement should result in more localized neural excitation patterns, an increase in the number of bipolar electrodes available, together with an increase in their dynamic range. These changes may lead to further improvements in speech perception among cochlear implant patients.
Keywordselectrode array; evoked potentials; cochlear pathology
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References
- Graeme Clark Collection