Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLenda, M
dc.contributor.authorSkorka, P
dc.contributor.authorKuszewska, K
dc.contributor.authorMoron, D
dc.contributor.authorBelcik, M
dc.contributor.authorBaczek Kwinta, R
dc.contributor.authorJanowiak, F
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, DH
dc.contributor.authorVesk, PA
dc.contributor.authorPossingham, HP
dc.contributor.authorKnops, JMH
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-21T02:55:09Z
dc.date.available2021-05-21T02:55:09Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-17
dc.identifier.citationLenda, M., Skorka, P., Kuszewska, K., Moron, D., Belcik, M., Baczek Kwinta, R., Janowiak, F., Duncan, D. H., Vesk, P. A., Possingham, H. P. & Knops, J. M. H. (2020). Misinformation, internet honey trading and beekeepers drive a plant invasion. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 24 (2), pp.165-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13645.
dc.identifier.issn1461-023X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/274725
dc.description.abstractBiological invasions are a major human induced global change that is threatening global biodiver-sity by homogenizing the world’s fauna and flora. Species spread because humans have movedspecies across geographical boundaries and have changed ecological factors that structure ecosys-tems, such as nitrogen deposition, disturbance, etc. Many biological invasions are caused acciden-tally, as a byproduct of human travel and commerce driven product shipping. However, humansalso have spread many species intentionally because of perceived benefits. Of interest is the role ofthe recent exponential growth in information exchange via internet social media in driving biologi-cal invasions. To date, this has not been examined. Here, we show that for one such invasive spe-cies, goldenrod, social networks spread misleading and incomplete information that is enhancingthe spread of goldenrod invasions into new environments. We show that the notion of goldenrodhoney as a “superfood” with unsupported healing properties is driving a demand that leads bee-keepers to produce goldenrod honey. Social networks provide a forum for such informationexchange and this is leading to further spread of goldenrod in many countries where goldenrod isnot native, such as Poland. However, this informal social information exchange ignores laws thatfocus on preventing the further spread of invasive species and the strong negative effects thatgoldenrod has on native ecosystems, including floral resources that negatively impact honeybeeperformance. Thus, scientifically unsupported information on “superfoods” such as goldenrodhoney that is disseminated through social internet networks has real world consequences such asincreased goldenrod invasions into novel geographical regions which decreases native biodiversity.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.titleMisinformation, internet honey trading and beekeepers drive a plant invasion
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ele.13645
melbourne.affiliation.departmentSchool of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences
melbourne.affiliation.facultyScience
melbourne.source.titleEcology Letters
melbourne.source.volume24
melbourne.source.issue2
melbourne.source.pages165-169
melbourne.elementsid1480372
melbourne.openaccess.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.13645
melbourne.openaccess.statusPublished version
melbourne.contributor.authorDuncan, David
melbourne.contributor.authorVesk, Peter
dc.identifier.eissn1461-0248
melbourne.accessrightsAccess this item via the Open Access location


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record