Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDawson, P. W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBlamey, P. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDettman, S. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBarker, E. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorClark, Graeme M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-21T20:27:55Z
dc.date.available2014-05-21T20:27:55Z
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.identifier.citationDawson, P. W., Blamey, P. J., Dettman, S. J., Barker, E. J., & Clark, G. M. (1995). A clinical report on receptive vocabulary skills in cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, June, 16(3), 287-294.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/27480
dc.descriptionThis is a publisher’s version of an article published in Ear and Hearing 1995. This version is reproduced with permission of Lippincott Wilkins & Williams.en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim was to measure the rate of vocabulary acquisition for cochlear implant users and compare the pre- and postoperative rates with published data for other groups with normal or impaired hearing. The hypothesis was that the postoperative rate would be greater than the preoperative rate. Design: The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) was administered to 32 children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults implanted with the 22-electrode cochlear implant. Age at implantation ranged from 2 y r 6 mo to 20 yr and implant use ranged from 6 mo to 7 yr 8 mo. Results: The group mean postoperative performance at various postoperative intervals was significantly higher than mean preoperative performance. Single-subject data indicated statistically significant gains over time on this test for 13 of the subjects. The mean postoperative rate of vocabulary acquisition of 1.06 times the rate for normally hearing children was significantly greater than the mean preoperative rate of 0.43. Conclusions: These rates of improvement were in accord with previous reports on smaller numbers of implant users, but could not be attributed unambiguously to use of the implant because no control group was used for this clinical work. Variables such as age at implantation, duration of profound deafness, communication mode, and speech perception skill failed to significantly predict rate of improvement on the PPVT.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofScientific publications, vol.9, 1995-1996, no.887en_US
dc.subjectcochlear implantsen_US
dc.subjectotolaryngologyen_US
dc.subjectotologyen_US
dc.titleA clinical report on receptive vocabulary skills in cochlear implant usersen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
melbourne.source.titleEar and Hearingen_US
melbourne.source.monthJuneen_US
melbourne.source.volume16en_US
melbourne.source.issue3en_US
melbourne.source.pages287-294en_US
melbourne.elementsidNA
melbourne.contributor.authorClark, Graeme
melbourne.contributor.authorBARKER, ELIZABETH
melbourne.contributor.authorDettman, Shani
melbourne.contributor.authorBlamey, Peter
melbourne.accessrightsOpen Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record