Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorXU, JINen_US
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, Robert K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMillard, Rodney E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorClark, Graeme M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-21T20:33:23Z
dc.date.available2014-05-21T20:33:23Z
dc.date.issued1997en_US
dc.identifier.citationXu, J., Shepherd, R. K., Millard, R. E., & Clark, G. M. (1997). Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study. Hearing Research, 105, 29-Jan.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/27569
dc.descriptionPublisher’s permission requested and denied.en_US
dc.description.abstractA major factor associated with recent improvements in the clinical performance of cochlear implant patients has been the development of speech-processing strategies based on high stimulation rates. While these processing strategies show clear clinical advantage, we know little of their long-term safety implications. The present study was designed to evaluate the physiological and histopathological effects of long-term intracochlear electrical stimulation using these high rates. Thirteen normal-hearing adult cats were bilaterally implanted with scala tympani electrode arrays and unilaterally stimulated for periods of up to 2100 h using either two pairs of bipolar or three monopolar stimulating electrodes. Stimuli consisted of short duration (25-50 µs/phase) charge-balanced biphasic current pulses presented at 1000 pulses per second (pps) per channel for monopolar stimulation, and 2000 pps/channel for bipolar stimulation. The electrodes were shorted between current pulses to minimize any residual direct current, and the pulse trains were presented using a 50% duty cycle (500 ms on; 500 ms oft) in order to simulate speech. Both acoustic (ABR) and electrical (EABR) auditory brainstem responses were recorded periodically during the chronic stimulation program, All cochleas showed an increase in the click-evoked ABR threshold following implant surgery; however, recovery to near-normal levels occurred in approximately half of the stimulated cochleas 1 month post-operatively. The use of frequency-specific stimuli indicated that the most extensive hearing loss generally occurred in the high-frequency basal region of the cochlea (12 and 24 kHz) adjacent to the stimulating electrode. However, thresholds at lower frequencies (2, 4 and 8 kHz), appeared at near-normal levels despite long-term electrode implantation and electrical stimulation. Our longitudinal EABR results showed a statistically significant increase in threshold in nearly 40% of the chronically stimulated electrodes evaluated; however, the gradient of the EABR input/output (I/O) function (evoked potential response amplitude versus stimulus current) generally remained quite stable throughout the chronic stimulation period. Histopathological examination of the cochleas showed no statistically significant difference in ganglion cell densities between cochleas using monopolar and bipolar electrode configurations (P = 0.67), and no evidence of cochlear damage caused by high-rate electrical stimulation when compared with control cochleas. Indeed, there was no statistically significant relationship between spiral ganglion cell density and electrical stimulation (P = 0.459), or between the extent of loss of inner (IHC, P = 0.86) or outer (OHC, P=0.30) hair cells and electrical stimulation. Spiral ganglion cell loss was, however, influenced by the degree of inflammation (P=0.016) and electrode insertion trauma. These histopathological findings were consistent with the physiological data. Finally, electrode impedance, measured at completion of the chronic stimulation program, showed close correlation with the degree of tissue response adjacent to the electrode array. These results indicated that chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation, using carefully controlled charge-balanced biphasic current pulses at stimulus rates of up to 2000 pps/channel, does not appear to adversely affect residual auditory nerve elements or the cochlea in general. This study provides an important basis for the safe application of improved speech-processing strategies based on high-rate electrical stimulation.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofScientific publications, vol.10, 1997, no. 835en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://tinyurl.com/3tzawpsen_US
dc.subjectcochlear implanten_US
dc.subjecthigh stimulus rateen_US
dc.subjectelectrical stimulationen_US
dc.subjectcochlear physiologyen_US
dc.subjectauditory brainstem responseen_US
dc.subjectelectrically-evoked auditory brainstem responsesen_US
dc.subjectelectrode impedanceen_US
dc.subjectcochlear histopathologyen_US
dc.titleChronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological studyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
melbourne.source.titleHearing Researchen_US
melbourne.source.volume105en_US
melbourne.source.pages1-29en_US
melbourne.elementsidNA
melbourne.contributor.authorClark, Graeme
melbourne.contributor.authorXu, Jin
melbourne.contributor.authorShepherd, Robert
melbourne.contributor.authorMillard, Rodney
melbourne.accessrightsThis item is currently not available from this repository


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record