Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarzing, AW
dc.date.available2014-05-21T21:00:30Z
dc.date.issued2005-01-01
dc.identifier.citationHarzing, A. W. (2005). Australian Research Output in Economics and Business: High Volume, Low Impact?. Australian Journal of Management, 30 (2), pp.183-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289620503000201.
dc.identifier.issn0312-8962
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/27978
dc.descriptionC1 - Refereed Journal Article
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates publication patterns of Australian academics in Economics & Business. I show that this discipline follows the general Australian trend of declining impact, measured as citations per paper, from the mid-1990s. However, the gap in Australia's ranking of publication quantity (number of papers) and publication quality (impact) is much wider in Economics & Business than in other disciplines. The discipline combines the highest ranking in quantity with the lowest ranking in quality. Seven possible explanations for this pattern are discussed.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.subjectBusiness and Management
dc.titleAustralian Research Output in Economics and Business: High Volume, Low Impact?
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/031289620503000201
melbourne.peerreviewPeer Reviewed
melbourne.affiliationThe University of Melbourne
melbourne.affiliation.departmentManagement and Marketing
melbourne.source.titleAustralian Journal of Management
melbourne.source.volume30
melbourne.source.issue2
melbourne.source.pages183-200
melbourne.publicationid40637
melbourne.elementsid270913
melbourne.contributor.authorHARZING, ANNE-WIL
melbourne.internal.ingestnoteAbstract bulk upload (2017-07-20)
dc.identifier.eissn1327-2020
melbourne.accessrightsThis item is currently not available from this repository


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record