Balancing the Elicitation Burden and the Richness of Expert Input When Quantifying Discrete Bayesian Networks
Loading...
Citations
Scopus:
Altmetric:
Altmetric::
Download
Associated Records
Authors
File Licence
Editors
Date
2022-06-01
Source Title
Risk Analysis
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
WILEY
Melbourne Authors
Affiliation
School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences
Document Type
Journal Article
Subject Code
Citation
Barons, M. J., Mascaro, S. & Hanea, A. M. (2022). Balancing the Elicitation Burden and the Richness of Expert Input When Quantifying Discrete Bayesian Networks. Risk Analysis, 42 (6), pp.1196-1234. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13772.
Access Status
Open Access
Access URL
Open Access URL
Open Access at PMC
Linked Resource URL
NHMRC Grant Code
ARC Grant Code
Description
Abstract
Structured expert judgment (SEJ) is a method for obtaining estimates of uncertain quantities from groups of experts in a structured way designed to minimize the pervasive cognitive frailties of unstructured approaches. When the number of quantities required is large, the burden on the groups of experts is heavy, and resource constraints may mean that eliciting all the quantities of interest is impossible. Partial elicitations can be complemented with imputation methods for the remaining, unelicited quantities. In the case where the quantities of interest are conditional probability distributions, the natural relationship between the quantities can be exploited to impute missing probabilities. Here we test the Bayesian intelligence interpolation method and its variations for Bayesian network conditional probability tables, called "InterBeta." We compare the various outputs of InterBeta on two cases where conditional probability tables were elicited from groups of experts. We show that interpolated values are in good agreement with experts' values and give guidance on how InterBeta could be used to good effect to reduce expert burden in SEJ exercises.