Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHobbs, EC
dc.contributor.authorReid, TJ
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-12T00:51:22Z
dc.date.available2021-10-12T00:51:22Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-04
dc.identifier.citationHobbs, E. C. & Reid, T. J. (2020). Animals and SARS-CoV-2: Species susceptibility and viral transmission in experimental and natural conditions, and the potential implications for community transmission. TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES, 68 (4), pp.1850-1867. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13885.
dc.identifier.issn1865-1674
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/287573
dc.description.abstractThe current COVID-19 global pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) of probable bat origin, has highlighted the ongoing need for a One Health response to emerging zoonotic disease events. Understanding the human-animal interface and its relevance to disease transmission remains a critical control point for many emerging zoonoses. Determination of the susceptibility of various animal species to infection with SARS-CoV-2 and the role of animals in the epidemiology of the disease will be critical to informing appropriate human and veterinary public health responses to this pandemic. A scoping literature review was conducted to collect, evaluate and present the available research evidence regarding SARS-CoV-2 infections in animals. Experimental studies have successfully demonstrated SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission in cats, ferrets, hamsters, bats and non-human primates under experimental settings. Dogs appear to have limited susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2, while other domestic species including pigs and poultry do not appear susceptible. Naturally occurring SARS-CoV-2 infections in animals appear uncommon, with 14 pets, 8 captive big cats and an unreported number of farmed mink testing positive at the time of writing (early July 2020). Infections typically appear asymptomatic in dogs, while clinical signs of respiratory and/or gastrointestinal disease tend to be mild to moderate in felines, and severe to fatal in mink. Most animals are presumed to have been infected by close contact with COVID-19 patients. In domestic settings, viral transmission is self-limiting; however in high-density animal environments, there can be sustained between-animal transmission. To date, two potential cases of animal-to-human transmission are being investigated, on infected mink farms. Given the millions of COVID-19 cases worldwide and ongoing potential for further zoonotic and anthroponotic viral transmission, further research and surveillance activities are needed to definitively determine the role of animals in community transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titleAnimals and SARS-CoV-2: Species susceptibility and viral transmission in experimental and natural conditions, and the potential implications for community transmission
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/tbed.13885
melbourne.affiliation.departmentVeterinary Biosciences
melbourne.affiliation.facultyVeterinary and Agricultural Sciences
melbourne.source.titleTransboundary and Emerging Diseases
melbourne.source.volume68
melbourne.source.issue4
melbourne.source.pages1850-1867
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
melbourne.elementsid1565009
melbourne.contributor.authorHobbs, Emma
dc.identifier.eissn1865-1682
melbourne.accessrightsOpen Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record