Beyond the contextual: the importance of theoretical knowledge in vocational qualifications and the implications for work
Citations
Altmetric
Author
Wheelahan, LeesaDate
2007Source Title
The times they are a-changin: researching transitions in lifelong learning: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference, Centre for Research in Lifelong LearningPublisher
Centre for Research in Lifelong Learning (CRLL)University of Melbourne Author/s
Wheelahan, LeesaAffiliation
Melbourne Graduate School of Education, LH Martin InstituteMetadata
Show full item recordDocument Type
Conference PaperCitations
Wheelahan, L. (2007). Beyond the contextual: the importance of theoretical knowledge in vocational qualifications and the implications for work. In The times they are a-changin: researching transitions in lifelong learning: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference, Centre for Research in Lifelong Learning, University of Stirling, UK.Access Status
Open AccessDescription
This is a post print of a paper from The times they are a-changin: researching transitions in lifelong learning: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference, Centre for Research in Lifelong Learning 2007 published by Centre for Research in Lifelong Learning (CRLL).
Abstract
This paper uses a Bernsteinian analysis to argue that vocational education and training (VET) qualifications in Australia deny students access to theoretical knowledge that underpins vocational practice. Australian VET qualifications are based on training packages, which are the equivalent of English National Vocational Qualifications (NVQs). Training packages are developed for broad industry areas (such as community services) and consist of qualifications at different levels that comprise 'industry'-specified units of competency. In 2005, 69% of all publicly funded VET provision was based on training packages (NCVER 2006: Table 4). The introduction of training packages caused fierce debate within Australia, particularly around the extent to which they provide students with access to 'underpinning knowledge'. Supporters of training packages argue that they merely specify the outcomes of training and the criteria that are used to assess whether those outcomes have been achieved. In contrast, I argue that training packages do shape curriculum and have consequences for teaching and learning, and consequently for the extent to which students are able to navigate the transition between formal and informal knowledge and formal and informal contexts. This argument is illustrated through comparing the current Diploma of Community Services (Community Development) with the Associate Diploma of Social Sciences (Community Development), which was the qualification that existed prior to the introduction of the Community Services training package.
The first section of this paper outlines a Bernsteinian analysis of the nature of disciplinary knowledge and its relationship to workplace knowledge and practice. The second section considers the extent to which training packages constitute curriculum, while the third compares and contrasts the two qualifications.
Keywords
vocational education; vocational qualifications; lifelong learning; sociology of educationExport Reference in RIS Format
Endnote
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".
Refworks
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References