Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOtmar, R
dc.contributor.authorHenry, MJ
dc.contributor.authorKotowicz, MA
dc.contributor.authorNicholson, GC
dc.contributor.authorKorn, S
dc.contributor.authorPasco, JA
dc.date.available2014-05-21T22:23:59Z
dc.date.available2010-02-03
dc.date.available2010-02-03
dc.date.available2010-02-03
dc.date.available2010-02-03
dc.date.available2010-02-03
dc.date.available2010-02-03
dc.date.available2010-02-03
dc.date.available2010-02-03
dc.date.available2010-02-03
dc.date.available2010-02-03
dc.date.issued2011-01-01
dc.identifierhttp://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000286003200030&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=d4d813f4571fa7d6246bdc0dfeca3a1c
dc.identifier.citationOtmar, R., Henry, M. J., Kotowicz, M. A., Nicholson, G. C., Korn, S. & Pasco, J. A. (2011). Patterns of treatment in Australian men following fracture. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 22 (1), pp.249-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1204-7.
dc.identifier.issn0937-941X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/29010
dc.description.abstractUNLABELLED: This study aimed to describe treatment initiation rates for men who had recently sustained a fracture. Most (75.9%) men potentially eligible for subsidised treatment at the time of fracture remained untreated even after a subsequent fracture. INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to describe treatment initiation rates for men who had recently sustained a fracture. METHODS: The study was conducted as part of the Geelong Osteoporosis Study in south-eastern Australia. Men in the study area who had sustained an incident fracture in the period July 2006 to December 2007 were identified from hospital radiology reports. A self-report questionnaire was sent to eligible participants approximately 12 months after fracture. Respondents were asked for details of medications prescribed for 'osteoporosis/fracture/low bone mass' before and after fracture, and where applicable, reasons for cessation of treatment. We analysed the results for 109 men aged 50 years and older who had sustained fracture in the study period. RESULTS: Most (75.9%) men potentially eligible for subsidised treatment at the time of fracture remained untreated. Of the 87 men who were untreated, nine had osteoporosis at the hip and/or spine and 29 (26.6%) reported having sustained a low trauma prior fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are consistent with previously published data showing low rates of treatment initiation in men eligible for osteoporosis treatment. There appear to be barriers involving participants' and medical practitioners' knowledge, beliefs and attitudes regarding osteoporosis and treatment, as well as in the doctor-patient partnership in osteoporosis management. Establishment of clinical pathways for fracture management beyond orthopaedic care may be one of a range of appropriate responses.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSPRINGER LONDON LTD
dc.titlePatterns of treatment in Australian men following fracture
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00198-010-1204-7
melbourne.affiliationThe University of Melbourne
melbourne.source.titleOSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
melbourne.source.volume22
melbourne.source.issue1
melbourne.source.pages249-254
melbourne.publicationid160375
melbourne.elementsid332830
melbourne.contributor.authorOTMAR, RENEE
melbourne.contributor.authorRogers, Margaret
melbourne.contributor.authorKotowicz, Mark
melbourne.contributor.authorNICHOLSON, GEOFFREY
melbourne.contributor.authorKORN, SAM
melbourne.contributor.authorPasco, Julie
dc.identifier.eissn1433-2965
melbourne.accessrightsThis item is currently not available from this repository


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record