Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLegacy, C
dc.date.available2014-05-21T23:08:15Z
dc.date.issued2010-11-01
dc.identifierhttp://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000285705800010&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=d4d813f4571fa7d6246bdc0dfeca3a1c
dc.identifier.citationLegacy, C. (2010). Investigating the knowledge interface between stakeholder engagement and plan-making. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 42 (11), pp.2705-2720. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43164.
dc.identifier.issn0308-518X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/29461
dc.description.abstractThe ‘ideal deliberative procedure’ provides structure to the process of stakeholder deliberation, yet creates a tension with the formal processes of strategic plan-making. This paper examines process design by drawing upon communicative planning theory, and the rational comprehensive model and deliberative democracy literature. In the context of metropolitan strategic spatial plan-making, the aim of this paper is to examine how the knowledge interface between the process of stakeholder engagement and the process of plan-making enables or inhibits implementation of the plan. A retrospective study examining the development of two metropolitan strategic spatial plans: Greater Perth's the Network City plan and Greater Vancouver's the Livable Region Strategic Plan is provided. It is revealed that the engagement of the planners, the public and the politicians occurs within formal stakeholder engagement ‘events’ positioned at different stages of the plan-making process. This paper reveals that the deliberation among the professional planners and the politicians at the process design stage steers the plan-making process in a manner that retains its legitimacy and creates a more implementable plan.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
dc.subjectUrban and Regional Planning
dc.titleInvestigating the knowledge interface between stakeholder engagement and plan-making
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1068/a43164
melbourne.peerreviewPeer Reviewed
melbourne.affiliationThe University of Melbourne
melbourne.affiliation.departmentArchitecture, Building and Planning
melbourne.source.titleEnvironment and Planning A
melbourne.source.volume42
melbourne.source.issue11
melbourne.source.pages2705-2720
dc.description.pagestart2705
melbourne.publicationid150263
melbourne.elementsid326191
melbourne.contributor.authorLegacy, Crystal
melbourne.internal.ingestnoteAbstract bulk upload (2017-07-20)
dc.identifier.eissn1472-3409
melbourne.accessrightsThis item is currently not available from this repository


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record