Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchroeder, D
dc.contributor.authorPogge, T
dc.date.available2014-05-22T00:55:55Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationSchroeder, D. & Pogge, T. (2009). Justice and the Convention on Biological Diversity. Ethics & International Affairs, 23 (3), pp.267-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2009.00217.x.
dc.identifier.issn0892-6794
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/30395
dc.description.abstractJustice and the Convention on Biological Diversity Doris Schroeder and Thomas Pogge Benefit sharing as envisaged by the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is a relatively new idea in international law. Within the context of non-human biological resources, it aims to guarantee the conservation of biodiversity and its sustainable use by ensuring that its custodians are adequately rewarded for its preservation. Prior to the adoption of the CBD, access to biological resources was frequently regarded as a free-for-all. Bioprospectors were able to take resources out of their natural habitat and develop commercial products without sharing benefits with states or local communities. This paper asks how CBD-style benefit-sharing fits into debates of justice. It is argued that the CBD is an example of a set of social rules designed to increase social utility. It is also argued that a common heritage of humankind principle with inbuilt benefit-sharing mechanisms would be preferable to assigning bureaucratic property rights to non-human biological resources. However, as long as the international economic order is characterized by serious distributive injustices, as reflected in the enormous poverty-related death toll in developing countries, any morally acceptable means toward redressing the balance in favor of the disadvantaged has to be welcomed. By legislating for a system of justice-in-exchange covering nonhuman biological resources in preference to a free-for-all situation, the CBD provides a small step forward in redressing the distributive justice balance. It therefore presents just legislation sensitive to the international relations context in the 21st century.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
dc.subjectPolitical Science
dc.titleJustice and the Convention on Biological Diversity
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1747-7093.2009.00217.x
melbourne.peerreviewPeer Reviewed
melbourne.affiliationThe University of Melbourne
melbourne.affiliation.departmentPhilosophy, Anthropology and Social Inquiry
melbourne.source.titleEthics and International Affairs
melbourne.source.volume23
melbourne.source.issue3
melbourne.source.pages267-280
dc.description.pagestart265
melbourne.publicationid137717
melbourne.elementsid318241
melbourne.contributor.authorPOGGE, THOMAS
melbourne.contributor.authorSchroeder, Doris
dc.identifier.eissn1747-7093
melbourne.accessrightsThis item is currently not available from this repository


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record