Amputees by choice: Body integrity identity disorder and the ethics of amputation
Loading...
Citations
Scopus:
Altmetric:
Altmetric::
Download
Associated Records
File Licence
Editors
Date
2005-03-01
Source Title
Journal of Applied Philosophy
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wiley
Melbourne Authors
Affiliation
Philosophy, Anthropology and Social Inquiry
Document Type
Journal Article
Subject Code
Citation
Bayne, T. & Levy, N. (2005). Amputees by choice: Body integrity identity disorder and the ethics of amputation. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22 (1), pp.75-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2005.00293.x.
Access Status
This item is currently not available from this repository
Access URL
Open Access URL
Open Access at PMC
Linked Resource URL
NHMRC Grant Code
ARC Grant Code
Description
Abstract
Should surgeons be permitted to amputate healthy limbs if patients request such operations? We argue that if such patients are experiencing significant distress as a consequence of the rare psychological disorder named Body Integrity Identity Disorder (BIID), such operations might be permissible. We examine rival accounts of the origins of the desire for healthy limb amputations and argue that none are as plausible as the BIID hypothesis. We then turn to the moral arguments against such operations, and argue that on the evidence available, none is compelling. BIID sufferers meet reasonable standards for rationality and autonomy: so as long as no other effective treatment for their disorder is available, surgeons ought to be allowed to accede to their requests.
Notes
Terms of Use
Keywords
Applied Ethics