Amputees by choice: body integrity identity disorder and the ethics of amputation.
AuthorBayne, T; Levy, N
Source TitleJournal of Applied Philosophy
University of Melbourne Author/sLEVY, NEIL
AffiliationPhilosophy, Anthropology and Social Inquiry
Document TypeJournal Article
CitationsBayne, T. & Levy, N. (2005). Amputees by choice: body integrity identity disorder and the ethics of amputation.. J Appl Philos, 22 (1), pp.75-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2005.00293.x.
Access StatusThis item is currently not available from this repository
Should surgeons be permitted to amputate healthy limbs if patients request such operations? We argue that if such patients are experiencing significant distress as a consequence of the rare psychological disorder named Body Integrity Identity Disorder (BIID), such operations might be permissible. We examine rival accounts of the origins of the desire for healthy limb amputations and argue that none are as plausible as the BIID hypothesis. We then turn to the moral arguments against such operations, and argue that on the evidence available, none is compelling. BIID sufferers meet reasonable standards for rationality and autonomy: so as long as no other effective treatment for their disorder is available, surgeons ought to be allowed to accede to their requests.
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References