Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorde Little, SC
dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, GJ
dc.contributor.authorBowman, DMJS
dc.contributor.authorWhelan, PI
dc.contributor.authorBrook, BW
dc.contributor.authorBradshaw, CJA
dc.date.available2014-05-22T06:15:40Z
dc.date.available2011-09-07
dc.date.available2011-09-07
dc.date.available2011-09-07
dc.date.issued2012-05-01
dc.identifierhttp://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000302469500008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=d4d813f4571fa7d6246bdc0dfeca3a1c
dc.identifier.citationde Little, S. C., Williamson, G. J., Bowman, D. M. J. S., Whelan, P. I., Brook, B. W. & Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2012). Experimental comparison of aerial larvicides and habitat modification for controlling disease-carrying Aedes vigilax mosquitoes. PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 68 (5), pp.709-717. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2317.
dc.identifier.issn1526-498X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/32511
dc.descriptionC1 - Journal Articles Refereed
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Microbial and insect-growth-regulator larvicides dominate current vector control programmes because they reduce larval abundance and are relatively environmentally benign. However, their short persistence makes them expensive, and environmental manipulation of larval habitat might be an alternative control measure. Aedes vigilax is a major vector species in northern Australia. A field experiment was implemented in Darwin, Australia, to test the hypotheses that (1) aerial microbial larvicide application effectively decreases Ae. vigilax larval presence, and therefore adult emergence, and (2) environmental manipulation is an effective alternative control measure. Generalised linear and mixed-effects modelling and information-theoretic comparisons were used to test these hypotheses. RESULTS: It is shown that the current aerial larvicide application campaign is effective at suppressing the emergence of Ae. vigilax, whereas vegetation removal is not as effective in this context. In addition, the results indicate that current larval sampling procedures are inadequate for quantifying larval abundance or adult emergence. CONCLUSIONS: This field-based comparison has shown that the existing larviciding campaign is more effective than a simple environmental management strategy for mosquito control. It has also identified an important knowledge gap in the use of larval sampling to evaluate the effectiveness of vector control strategies.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherJOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
dc.subjectForestry Pests
dc.subjectHealth and Diseases; Control of Animal Pests
dc.subjectDiseases and Exotic Species in Forest and Woodlands Environments
dc.titleExperimental comparison of aerial larvicides and habitat modification for controlling disease-carrying Aedes vigilax mosquitoes
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ps.2317
melbourne.peerreviewPeer Reviewed
melbourne.affiliationThe University of Melbourne
melbourne.affiliation.departmentInfrastructure Engineering
melbourne.source.titlePEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
melbourne.source.volume68
melbourne.source.issue5
melbourne.source.pages709-717
melbourne.publicationid178140
melbourne.elementsid344196
melbourne.contributor.authorde Little, Siobhan
dc.identifier.eissn1526-4998
melbourne.accessrightsThis item is currently not available from this repository


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record