Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWeber, Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-22T07:44:18Z
dc.date.available2014-05-22T07:44:18Z
dc.date.issued2011-03-01
dc.identifier1755-0203
dc.identifier.citationWeber, Z. (2011). THE INADEQUACY OF A PROPOSED PARACONSISTENT SET THEORY REPLY. REVIEW OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC, 4 (1), pp.109-113. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020310000304.
dc.identifier.issn1755-0203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/33009
dc.description© 2011 Association for Symbolic Logic. Online edition of the journal is available at http://journals.cambridge.org/RSL
dc.description.abstractIn Bjørdal (2010), Bjørdal presents a paraconsistent set theory in which ∀x(x _= x) is a theorem. The author rightly claims that, while not trivializing (in the sense of proving everything), results like this are to be avoided. The set theory presented in Bjørdal (2010) is based on that of Weber (2010b), but with an introduced definition of identity—which is used, in effect, as a new axiom. With this added notion of identity, the non-self-identity of every object does in fact obtain; and so the set theory presented by Bjørdal is inadequate.......
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherCAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
dc.titleTHE INADEQUACY OF A PROPOSED PARACONSISTENT SET THEORY REPLY
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1755020310000304
melbourne.peerreviewPeer Reviewed
melbourne.affiliationThe University of Melbourne
melbourne.affiliation.departmentSchool of Historical and Philosophical Studies, Faculty of Arts
melbourne.publication.statusPublished
melbourne.source.titleReview of Symbolic Logic
melbourne.source.volume4
melbourne.source.issue1
melbourne.source.pages109-113
melbourne.elementsid575968
melbourne.contributor.authorWeber, Zach
dc.identifier.eissn1755-0211
melbourne.accessrightsOpen Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record