Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAli, M
dc.contributor.authorEnglish, C
dc.contributor.authorBernhardt, J
dc.contributor.authorSunnerhagen, KS
dc.contributor.authorBrady, M
dc.date.available2014-05-22T08:27:33Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.identifierhttp://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000312885800007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=d4d813f4571fa7d6246bdc0dfeca3a1c
dc.identifier.citationAli, M., English, C., Bernhardt, J., Sunnerhagen, K. S. & Brady, M. (2013). More outcomes than trials: a call for consistent data collection across stroke rehabilitation trials. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 8 (1), pp.18-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00973.x.
dc.identifier.issn1747-4930
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/33243
dc.descriptionC2 - Journal Articles Unrefereed
dc.description.abstractStroke survivors experience complex combinations of impairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions. The essential components of stroke rehabilitation remain elusive. Determining efficacy in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is challenging; there is no commonly agreed primary outcome measure for rehabilitation trials. Clinical guidelines depend on proof of efficacy in RCTs and meta-analyses. However, diverse trial aims, differing methods, inconsistent data collection, and use of multiple assessment tools hinder comparability across trials. Consistent data collection in acute stroke trials has facilitated meta-analyses to inform trial design and clinical practice. With few exceptions, inconsistent data collection has hindered similar progress in stroke rehabilitation research. There is an urgent need for the routine collection of a core dataset of common variables in rehabilitation trials. The European Stroke Organisation Outcomes Working Group, the National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Common Data Elements project, and the Collaborative Stroke Audit and Research project have called for consistency in data collection in stroke trials. Standardizing data collection can decrease study start up times, facilitate data sharing, and inform clinical guidelines. Although achieving consensus on which outcome measures to use in stroke rehabilitation trials is a considerable task, perhaps a feasible starting point is to achieve consistency in the collection of data on demography, stroke severity, and stroke onset to inclusion times. Longer term goals could include the development of a consensus process to establish the core dataset. This should be endorsed by researchers, funders, and journal editors in order to facilitate sustainable change.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
dc.subjectCardiology (incl. Cardiovascular Diseases); Rehabilitation and Therapy (excl. Physiotherapy); Central Nervous System; Expanding Knowledge in the Medical and Health Sciences
dc.titleMore outcomes than trials: a call for consistent data collection across stroke rehabilitation trials
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00973.x
melbourne.affiliationThe University of Melbourne
melbourne.affiliation.departmentFlorey Department Of Neuroscience And Mental Health
melbourne.source.titleInternational Journal of Stroke
melbourne.source.volume8
melbourne.source.issue1
melbourne.source.pages18-24
melbourne.publicationid197261
melbourne.elementsid543144
melbourne.contributor.authorBernhardt, Julie
melbourne.contributor.authorEnglish, Coralie
dc.identifier.eissn1747-4949
melbourne.fieldofresearch320101 Cardiology (incl. cardiovascular diseases)
melbourne.fieldofresearch420109 Rehabilitation
melbourne.fieldofresearch320903 Central nervous system
melbourne.seocode280103 Expanding knowledge in the biomedical and clinical science
melbourne.accessrightsThis item is currently not available from this repository


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record