Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRogers, J
dc.date.available2014-05-22T08:32:10Z
dc.date.issued2012-10-01
dc.identifierhttp://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000309068400016&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=d4d813f4571fa7d6246bdc0dfeca3a1c
dc.identifier.citationRogers, J. (2012). Building the links between surveillance, research, and policy and practice - dental public health experiences in Australia. COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 40 (s2), pp.82-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00725.x.
dc.identifier.issn0301-5661
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/33268
dc.descriptionC1 - Journal Articles Refereed
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To identify how to translate dental public health surveillance and broader research into policy and practice. METHODS: Via a literature review to identify both the potential uses of surveillance data and key elements in the policy making process. Then through a consideration of Australian dental public health examples to identify ways to build links between this research and policy making. RESULTS: The development of dental public health policy can be complex. Different notions of evidence are held by researchers and policy makers. A cultural gap divides these two groups. Translation of research into policy is more likely if an issue is moved up the policy agenda through judicial articulation of the problem with an associated policy proposal and where political factors are positive. If these elements exist, a policy outcome is more possible when a 'policy window' opens. Five ways to build the links between surveillance, research and policy and practice are to communicate across the cultural gap; be prepared for chance opportunities to transfer knowledge; undertake policy relevant research; don't abuse research evidence by making exaggerated claims; and provide timely dissemination of surveillance and research findings. Structural barriers to academics having greater engagement with policy agencies also need to be addressed. CONCLUSION: Translating surveillance and broader research evidence into policy requires active management rather than expecting passive diffusion. Researchers need to understand and act on the external factors that are likely to affect the uptake of their research if they want their research to influence policy and practice.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.subjectHealth Promotion; Dental Health
dc.titleBuilding the links between surveillance, research, and policy and practice - dental public health experiences in Australia
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00725.x
melbourne.peerreviewPeer Reviewed
melbourne.affiliationThe University of Melbourne
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMelbourne Dental School
melbourne.source.titleCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology
melbourne.source.volume40
melbourne.source.issues2
melbourne.source.pages82-89
melbourne.publicationid197163
melbourne.elementsid350256
melbourne.contributor.authorRogers, John
dc.identifier.eissn1600-0528
melbourne.fieldofresearch420603 Health promotion
melbourne.seocode200402 Dental health
melbourne.accessrightsThis item is currently not available from this repository


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record