Human Rights Criticism of the World Bank’s Private Sector Development and Privatization Projects
AuthorDavis, Dr Thomas W D; Kinley, Prof David
University of Melbourne Author/sDavis, Thomas
AffiliationArts: Education Policy and Management
CitationsDavis, Dr Thomas W D and Kinley, Prof David (2004) Human Rights Criticism of the World Bank’s Private Sector Development and Privatization Projects.
Access StatusThis item is currently not available from this repository
This is a research paper produced for the World Bank on consultancy.
The brief this Discussion Paper fulfils is to provide an account of the major criticisms directed at the World Bank’s private sector-oriented projects, and to determine what, if any, consequences for the protection of human rights are revealed by those criticisms. The approach adopted in this paper is first to identify key criticisms through empirical research and then to subject them to human rights analysis. This provides the basis for a clear account of the legal and programmatic implications for the Bank, today and in the future, of those human rights obligations and duties raised, directly or indirectly, by the critics of the Bank. It is not within this Discussion Paper’s brief to weigh up the substantive pros and cons of the public criticisms it identifies. Instead, the paper conveys a sense of what this debate between the Bank and its critics might look like if rendered in human rights terms. The World Bank is no stranger to criticism of its projects, especially in respect of its privatization and private sector development projects. Critics point to the environmental, social and cultural damage that certain projects have caused, which for some appears not just to be a product of the individual projects themselves, but symptomatic of a broader policy failure within the Bank to engage with the social consequences of its actions. In fact, and somewhat surprisingly, both the Bank’s critics and its defenders seldom employ human rights language in their reasoning and rhetoric, and where they do, it is only fleetingly and often lacking in any real substance. This is surprising because of so much of what the Bank does can be, and is, supportive of the objects of international human rights standards, especially in respect of economic, social and cultural rights. It is a central theme of this Discussion Paper that for the Bank to embrace this fact alone would be a very significant step towards it being better able not only to respond to its critics, but also,
KeywordsWorld Bank; NGOs; human rights; international law; public policy
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References