Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavis, Dr Thomas W Den_US
dc.contributor.authorKinley, Prof Daviden_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-22T08:56:38Z
dc.date.available2014-05-22T08:56:38Z
dc.date.issued2004-02en_US
dc.date.submitted2006-09-19en_US
dc.identifier.citationDavis, Dr Thomas W D and Kinley, Prof David (2004) Human Rights Criticism of the World Bank’s Private Sector Development and Privatization Projects.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/33398
dc.descriptionThis is a research paper produced for the World Bank on consultancy.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe brief this Discussion Paper fulfils is to provide an account of the major criticisms directed at the World Bank’s private sector-oriented projects, and to determine what, if any, consequences for the protection of human rights are revealed by those criticisms. The approach adopted in this paper is first to identify key criticisms through empirical research and then to subject them to human rights analysis. This provides the basis for a clear account of the legal and programmatic implications for the Bank, today and in the future, of those human rights obligations and duties raised, directly or indirectly, by the critics of the Bank. It is not within this Discussion Paper’s brief to weigh up the substantive pros and cons of the public criticisms it identifies. Instead, the paper conveys a sense of what this debate between the Bank and its critics might look like if rendered in human rights terms. The World Bank is no stranger to criticism of its projects, especially in respect of its privatization and private sector development projects. Critics point to the environmental, social and cultural damage that certain projects have caused, which for some appears not just to be a product of the individual projects themselves, but symptomatic of a broader policy failure within the Bank to engage with the social consequences of its actions. In fact, and somewhat surprisingly, both the Bank’s critics and its defenders seldom employ human rights language in their reasoning and rhetoric, and where they do, it is only fleetingly and often lacking in any real substance. This is surprising because of so much of what the Bank does can be, and is, supportive of the objects of international human rights standards, especially in respect of economic, social and cultural rights. It is a central theme of this Discussion Paper that for the Bank to embrace this fact alone would be a very significant step towards it being better able not only to respond to its critics, but also,en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.subjectWorld Banken_US
dc.subjectNGOsen_US
dc.subjecthuman rightsen_US
dc.subjectinternational lawen_US
dc.subjectpublic policyen_US
dc.titleHuman Rights Criticism of the World Bank’s Private Sector Development and Privatization Projectsen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
melbourne.peerreviewNon Peer Revieweden_US
melbourne.affiliation.departmentArts: Education Policy and Managementen_US
melbourne.publication.statusUnpublisheden_US
melbourne.source.month02en_US
melbourne.elementsidNA
melbourne.contributor.authorDavis, Thomas
melbourne.accessrightsThis item is currently not available from this repository


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record