Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYoung, Ivan M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRait, Julian L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGuest, Charles S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCarson, Cathy A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Hugh R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-22T09:04:24Z
dc.date.available2014-05-22T09:04:24Z
dc.date.issued1994en_US
dc.date.submitted2006-11-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationYoung, I. M., Rait, J. L., Guest, C. S., Carson, C. A. & Taylor, H. R. (1994). Comparison between Fastpac and conventional Humphrey perimetry. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology, 22, 95-99.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/33440
dc.descriptionPublisher's version is restricted access in accordance with the publisher's policy.en_US
dc.description.abstractAs part of the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project, a substudy was performed to determine the efficacy of the newly released Fastpac program for the Humphrey Field Analyser. A comparison was performed of the Fastpac and conventional full threshold 24-2 fields obtained in 39 eyes of 36 participants. Also a comparison study was performed of the standard and non-standard 80-point screening tests to the standard 24-2 full threshold test in 23 eyes of 23 participants.In the full threshold comparison there was 100% agreement between the two with Fastpac being 32% to 39% faster than standard. In the 80-point screening test comparison, nonstandard was no faster than standard. Sensitivities were 17/17 (1.0) for nonstandard and 15/18 (0.83) for standard, as compared with the standard 24-2 full threshold test.Fastpac software offers accurate screening and threshold testing in less time than the standard algorithm.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishingen_US
dc.subjectCERAen_US
dc.subjectophthalmologyen_US
dc.subjectCentre for Eye Research Australiaen_US
dc.subjecteye researchen_US
dc.subjectvisionen_US
dc.subjectvisual healthen_US
dc.titleComparison between Fastpac and conventional Humphrey perimetryen_US
dc.typeJournal (Paginated)en_US
melbourne.peerreviewPeer Revieweden_US
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMedicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences: Centre for Eye Research Australiaen_US
melbourne.affiliation.departmentSchool of Medicine: Ophthalmologyen_US
melbourne.publication.statusPublisheden_US
melbourne.source.titleAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmologyen_US
melbourne.source.volume22en_US
melbourne.source.pages95-99en_US
melbourne.elementsidNA
melbourne.contributor.authorTaylor, Hugh
melbourne.accessrightsThis item is currently not available from this repository


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record